{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp04_retrieval_first_paired20_20260802","cell_id":"layer_decay_and_expiration_management__logistics_supply_chain","considered_ids":["H3","H5"],"selected_id":"H5","dispositions":[{"hypothesis_id":"H3","lane":"REJECT","reason":"The critic classifies the core mechanism as ESTABLISHED_PRACTICE: regulated archive readability, linkage preservation, and periodic restoration testing are already required, leaving only a narrow evaluation protocol rather than a differentiated treatment mechanism."},{"hypothesis_id":"H5","lane":"FINALIST","reason":"Despite substantial collision with existing end-dated and persistent override controls, the critic identifies a material, repairable residual workflow—evidence-based owner renewal, live-commitment dependency gating, and reversible post-expiry quarantine—with an explicit operational falsifier."}],"selection_reason":"H5 offers the strongest eligible contrast: a bounded, testable override-expiration workflow addressing a moderately supported planning problem. H3 is ineligible because its treatment mechanism is established practice."}