{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp04_retrieval_first_paired20_20260802","cell_id":"negative_space_design__disaster_management","round_index":0,"assessments":[{"hypothesis_id":"H1","search_queries":["emergency dispatch CAD focus mode incident screen hide controls dispatcher","NG911 CAD user interface human factors dispatcher alerts display standards","APCO CAD minimum functional requirements emergency dispatch user interface","public safety CAD software incident focus view first party dispatcher"],"sources":[{"source_id":"H1_S1","title":"Unified CAD Functional Requirements","publisher":"U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs","url":"https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/unified-cad-functional-requirements","source_class":"GOVERNMENT_OR_REGULATOR","claims_supported":["The APCO-authored manual provides comprehensive CAD requirements spanning call handling, dispatch support, resource management, incident management, administration, monitoring, and interfaces.","It establishes the broad functional baseline against which omission of controls or information must be evaluated."]},{"source_id":"H1_S2","title":"InMotion CAD","publisher":"MobileTec","url":"https://mobiletec.net/cad-2/","source_class":"COMMERCIAL_FIRST_PARTY","claims_supported":["A deployed commercial CAD analogue already places commonly used functions in one display to eliminate separate menus and cluttered desktops.","The product retains call history, hazards, procedures, routing instructions, and special instructions, illustrating the safety-sensitive context that a focus mode must preserve."]},{"source_id":"H1_S3","title":"Dispatcher Solutions","publisher":"Motorola Solutions","url":"https://www.motorolasolutions.com/content/dam/msi/docs/products/smart-public-safety-solutions/roles/dispatcher_solution_brief.pdf","source_class":"COMMERCIAL_FIRST_PARTY","claims_supported":["PremierOne CAD integrates important CAD and 9-1-1 information into one screen and streamlines workflow so dispatchers can focus on an incident.","The source describes filtering duplicate, unusable, or irrelevant multimedia while retaining a unified operational view and safety-relevant information."]}],"closest_analogue":"Motorola PremierOne's integrated incident view, combined with MobileTec InMotion CAD's single streamlined display.","overlap":"Incident-centered presentation, reduced screen switching and desktop clutter, selection of relevant information, rapid resource assignment, and continued access to hazards, unit status, and other safety information.","remaining_difference":"The hypothesis specifically proposes a temporary, assignment-scoped state that reversibly hides noncritical chrome, uses an explicit safety-control whitelist, and ends on assignment completion or manual restoration. A controlled simulation can test whether that state produces the claimed time improvement without wrong-unit assignments or missed safety alerts.","classification":"POSSIBLE_DISTINCTION","disposition":"ADVANCE","rationale":"First-party systems already claim streamlined, incident-focused displays, so the broad focus concept is occupied. The searched analogues do not establish the narrower reversible control-hiding state with a completion trigger and safety-alert noninferiority test. Advancement is based on that bounded implementation and evaluation difference, not on search failure."},{"hypothesis_id":"H2","search_queries":["FEMA emergency shelter layout accessible routes cots spacing guidance","ADA emergency shelters accessible routes aisles cots official","Red Cross shelter facility survey accessible route cot spacing","NFPA emergency shelter aisle width cots evacuation"],"sources":[{"source_id":"H2_S1","title":"Emergency Planning","publisher":"U.S. Department of Justice, ADA.gov","url":"https://www.ada.gov/topics/emergency-planning/","source_class":"OFFICIAL_GUIDANCE","claims_supported":["Shelter staff are directed to maintain accessible routes and place beds so they do not block those routes.","Official guidance also calls for barrier surveys, accessible emergency exits, and stress-relief zones."]},{"source_id":"H2_S2","title":"ADA Checklist for Emergency Shelters","publisher":"U.S. Department of Justice, ADA.gov Archive","url":"https://archive.ada.gov/pcatoolkit/chap7shelterchk.htm","source_class":"OFFICIAL_GUIDANCE","claims_supported":["The checklist treats accessible routes as essential connections among shelter sleeping, service, activity, entrance, and egress areas.","It specifies generally clear routes at least 36 inches wide, with only limited narrowing, and requires maneuvering space in relevant shelter areas."]},{"source_id":"H2_S3","title":"Red Cross On-Site Shelter Survey Form","publisher":"American Red Cross via Washington County, Oregon","url":"https://www.washingtoncountyor.gov/emc/documents/american-red-cross-onsite-survey/download?inline=","source_class":"OFFICIAL_ORGANIZATION_DATA","claims_supported":["The Red Cross survey records accessible routes to service areas and distraction-reduced areas as shelter suitability attributes.","It defines accessible hallways and corridors as at least 36 inches wide, level, and free of route or overhead hazards."]}],"closest_analogue":"The ADA emergency-shelter accessible-route requirements and Red Cross shelter survey process.","overlap":"Predefined unoccupied circulation areas, explicit dimensional boundaries, beds and supplies kept out of routes, accessibility and egress purposes, facility-level marking and inspection, and separate low-distraction space.","remaining_difference":"The proposed formal trigger for exceptional infill and its matched-occupancy obstruction-rate experiment are evaluation and governance details, not a distinct spatial intervention.","classification":"OBVIOUS_COLLISION","disposition":"REJECT","rationale":"Official shelter guidance already requires staff to maintain the same protected circulation voids and avoid bed obstruction, while Red Cross surveying operationalizes clear accessible routes and reduced-distraction areas. The hypothesis substantially restates this established practice and adds a performance threshold."},{"hypothesis_id":"H3","search_queries":["FEMA incident action plan briefing ICS 202 operational briefing required elements annexes","FEMA operational period briefing agenda incident action plan forms annex","emergency response briefing layered information annex critical actions handoff","WHO emergency medical team briefing checklist first operational period disaster"],"sources":[{"source_id":"H3_S1","title":"Incident Briefings and Meetings: Operational Period Briefing","publisher":"Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Management Institute","url":"https://emilms.fema.gov/_is0200c/groups/454.html","source_class":"OFFICIAL_GUIDANCE","claims_supported":["FEMA says ICS briefings should be concise, pass vital information for response actions, and avoid long discussions or complex decision-making.","Field-level briefings focus personnel on specific tasks, work areas, reporting relationships, and expectations.","The operational-period briefing presents the IAP under a set agenda covering objectives, situation, assignments, logistics, communications, safety, and other activated functions."]},{"source_id":"H3_S2","title":"ICS Forms Booklet and Instructions, FEMA 502-2","publisher":"Federal Emergency Management Agency","url":"https://training.fema.gov/emiweb/is/icsresource/assets/ics%20forms/ics%20forms%20-%20instructions%20%28v3%29.pdf","source_class":"OFFICIAL_GUIDANCE","claims_supported":["Standard ICS forms are designed around essential data elements for incident action planning and documentation.","Only specified forms are typically included in an IAP, while other forms support incident management outside the main IAP.","FEMA expressly permits clearly labeled appendices and jurisdiction-specific extensions when additional information is needed."]}],"closest_analogue":"FEMA's concise field or operational-period briefing supported by a standardized Incident Action Plan and clearly labeled appendices.","overlap":"Primary emphasis on immediate objectives, assignments, constraints, communications, and safety; concise oral delivery; fuller written context distributed through the IAP; and labeled extensions or appendices for additional information.","remaining_difference":"The proposed experiment measures unaided action recall and context-retrieval failures and sets a 15-point target, but the cut-plus-recoverable-support structure itself is already present in ICS briefing practice.","classification":"OBVIOUS_COLLISION","disposition":"REJECT","rationale":"FEMA already separates concise, task-focused briefing delivery from the broader standardized IAP and optional appendices. The hypothesis chiefly supplies a new evaluation metric and threshold for that established layered briefing pattern."},{"hypothesis_id":"H4","search_queries":["official emergency alert app \"no active alerts\" location permissions offline status","FEMA app no alerts location permissions emergency alerts official","Red Cross emergency app no alerts location services official","public warning app false reassurance no alert system outage research"],"sources":[{"source_id":"H4_S1","title":"Check Out the New and Improved Red Cross Emergency App","publisher":"American Red Cross","url":"https://www.redcross.org/about-us/news-and-events/news/2022/check-out-the-new-and-improved-red-cross-emergency-app.html","source_class":"OFFICIAL_PRODUCT_DOCUMENTATION","claims_supported":["The app supports customized alerts for multiple saved locations and the current location.","It includes preloaded guidance usable without connectivity, but that offline content is distinct from live-alert availability.","The app exposes language, accessibility, and critical-alert configuration relevant to interpreting whether coverage is active."]},{"source_id":"H4_S2","title":"I am not receiving push notifications (iOS)","publisher":"American Red Cross Emergency App Support","url":"https://3sidedcubehelp.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/4984577369873-I-am-not-receiving-push-notifications-iOS","source_class":"OFFICIAL_PRODUCT_DOCUMENTATION","claims_supported":["Alert silence can result from per-location and per-hazard settings inside the app.","It can also result from operating-system notification permissions or Do Not Disturb configuration.","Current troubleshooting requires users to inspect app and phone settings rather than receiving an explicit causal diagnosis from a generic quiet alert view."]},{"source_id":"H4_S3","title":"Methods to Receive Weather Warning Information","publisher":"National Weather Service","url":"https://www.weather.gov/media/top/swaw/Fridayreminders.pdf","source_class":"OFFICIAL_GUIDANCE","claims_supported":["No single warning method is guaranteed not to fail, and relying on one method risks missing a warning.","Wireless alerts omit some hazard categories, watches, and advisories.","The National Weather Service recommends multiple warning sources and follow-up channels."]}],"closest_analogue":"The American Red Cross Emergency App's location-specific alert configuration and troubleshooting workflow, paired with National Weather Service multi-channel warning guidance.","overlap":"Location and hazard coverage settings, notification-permission dependencies, offline versus live functionality, accessibility support, and guidance to use multiple warning channels.","remaining_difference":"A check-session screen would diagnose and visibly distinguish no active threat, uncovered location or hazard, disabled permission, stale data, and service failure while showing timestamp, coverage, and the appropriate next action. The testable question is whether these cause-specific states reduce false-safe interpretations without inducing excess protective action.","classification":"POSSIBLE_DISTINCTION","disposition":"ADVANCE","rationale":"Existing official products expose the underlying settings and provide separate troubleshooting, while official guidance acknowledges that warning channels can fail or omit hazards. The bounded distinction is an in-context causal diagnosis of silence and a behavioral false-safety test; the screen is not presumed novel merely because the shallow search did not reveal an exact implementation."},{"hypothesis_id":"H5","search_queries":["after action review silent reflection participants first emergency responders","FEMA after action review facilitation junior responders rank psychological safety","US Army after action review facilitator remain silent junior leader participation","structured debrief silent writing nominal group technique emergency services after action review"],"sources":[{"source_id":"H5_S1","title":"The Global Practice of After Action Review","publisher":"World Health Organization","url":"https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-WHE-CPI-2019.9","source_class":"OFFICIAL_GUIDANCE","claims_supported":["Emergency-response AARs are structured collective reflection on participants' experiences and perceptions.","They range from informal team debriefs to facilitated multisector workshops and are intended as constructive learning rather than individual performance evaluation."]},{"source_id":"H5_S2","title":"FM 7-0, Appendix K: After Action Reviews","publisher":"United States Army, First Army","url":"https://www.first.army.mil/Portals/102/FM%207-0%20Appendix%20K.pdf","source_class":"STANDARD","claims_supported":["Army AAR doctrine requires candid discussion, broad participation, multiple perspectives, and facilitator efforts to draw in reluctant participants.","It states that no one, regardless of rank or personality, has all the information and directs the facilitator to enter discussion only when necessary.","It allows subordinate leaders to restate the mission and uses open-ended questions so participants self-discover issues and solutions."]},{"source_id":"H5_S3","title":"CDC Guidelines: Improving the Quality","publisher":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention","url":"https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/24407/cdc_24407_DS1.pdf","source_class":"OFFICIAL_GUIDANCE","claims_supported":["CDC guidance recommends giving participants quiet time to think or write before group discussion to balance participation styles.","Nominal Group Technique begins with silent, independent written idea generation followed by serial sharing and discussion.","The technique was designed to reduce adverse effects of status and verbal aggressiveness, directly addressing domination by powerful participants."]}],"closest_analogue":"An Army-style participatory AAR conducted with the opening silent-generation and serial-sharing stages of Nominal Group Technique.","overlap":"Bounded quiet reflection, powerful-facilitator restraint, participant-generated evidence, deliberate inclusion of reluctant or lower-status voices, participant-first sharing, written issue capture, and safeguards against rank or personality domination.","remaining_difference":"Applying the combined protocol specifically to disaster-response AARs and measuring which rank first raises each issue would be a domain evaluation; it does not create a materially different facilitation mechanism.","classification":"OBVIOUS_COLLISION","disposition":"REJECT","rationale":"Army AAR doctrine already requires rank-neutral participation, facilitator restraint, reluctant-participant inclusion, and subordinate perspectives. CDC's established Nominal Group Technique supplies the exact silent-reflection and serial participant-sharing lever for countering status domination. Their combination closely occupies the hypothesis."}],"nominated_ids":["H1","H4"],"replenishment_recommended":false}