{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp04_retrieval_first_paired20_20260802","cell_id":"negative_space_design__information_theory","hypothesis_id":"H4","search_queries":["IEEE Transactions Information Theory author supplementary material appendices main text results guidelines","scientific article supplementary materials essential information main text reporting guideline","experiment shorter scientific paper results reader comprehension redundant information","progressive disclosure scientific articles supplementary information reader study","patent layered scientific document progressive disclosure supplementary results","NISO RP-15-2013 supplemental journal article materials essential main article","ACM supplementary material policy paper must stand alone review appendix","information theory paper presentation multiple bounds comparison readability"],"sources":[{"source_id":"S1","title":"Supplementary Material Metadata, Journal Publishing Tag Library NISO JATS Version 1.3d1","publisher":"National Library of Medicine","url":"https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/tag-library/1.3d1/element/supplementary-material.html","source_class":"STANDARD","claims_supported":["NISO JATS distinguishes integral content essential to full understanding from additional content that supplies useful detail but is not essential.","The standard supports anchored cross-references between article figures or tables and external supplementary objects, closely matching recoverable removal with context preservation."]},{"source_id":"S2","title":"Publishing supplementary material","publisher":"Cambridge University Press","url":"https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/authors/publishing-supplementary-material","source_class":"OFFICIAL_GUIDANCE","claims_supported":["Cambridge instructs authors to place beneficial but nonessential material in supplements while requiring the main article to stand alone.","Supplementary files are published with the article, retained as part of the scholarly record, made available to reviewers, and referenced at appropriate points in the main text."]},{"source_id":"S3","title":"Prepare Supplementary Materials","publisher":"IEEE Author Center","url":"https://journals.ieeeauthorcenter.ieee.org/create-your-ieee-journal-article/prepare-supplementary-materials/","source_class":"OFFICIAL_GUIDANCE","claims_supported":["IEEE supports separately uploaded supplementary files and publishes accepted supplemental packages with the article in IEEE Xplore.","IEEE's README guidance provides descriptions and packing lists that make displaced material identifiable and recoverable, although it does not prescribe a claim-centered estimator-selection test."]},{"source_id":"S4","title":"Structuring supplemental materials in support of reproducibility","publisher":"Genome Biology","url":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13059-017-1205-3","source_class":"AUTHORITATIVE_SECONDARY","claims_supported":["The article explicitly proposes off-loading data and detail to make main text more readable.","It proposes a linked hierarchy in which supplementary sections parallel main-text sections, preserving context and allowing readers to recover expanded results locally.","It also documents the counter-risk that poorly organized supplements can bury analyses and become difficult to navigate."]},{"source_id":"S5","title":"General Submission Instructions","publisher":"ACM Collective Intelligence 2026","url":"https://ci.acm.org/2026/general-submission-instructions.html","source_class":"OFFICIAL_GUIDANCE","claims_supported":["The venue permits additional results, derivations, and explanations in separately uploaded supplementary material.","Reviewers are obligated to read only the paper and may consult supplements at their discretion, reinforcing the requirement that claim-essential evidence remain in the main text."]},{"source_id":"S6","title":"Supplemental Material","publisher":"American Society of Mechanical Engineers","url":"https://www.asme.org/publications-submissions/journals/information-for-authors/to-use-the-submission-tool/supplemental-material","source_class":"OFFICIAL_GUIDANCE","claims_supported":["ASME defines supplementary material as related but nonessential and requires the paper to remain complete and standalone.","It supports linked supplemental tables, figures, and text but warns that published supplements are not edited or typeset, limiting the strength of recoverability guarantees."]}],"proximity":"ESTABLISHED_PRACTICE","closest_analogues":[{"name":"NISO integral-versus-additional content classification","similarity":"Very high: it already supplies an explicit context-preservation test—whether material is essential for full understanding—and a standardized mechanism for linking nonessential tables, figures, and detail outside the base article.","remaining_difference":"It is publication-wide infrastructure, not a tested rule specifically for redundant bounds or estimators in information-theory manuscripts, and it specifies no reader-speed or qualification-recall outcome.","source_ids":["S1"]},{"name":"Linked hierarchical supplements","similarity":"Very high: Greenbaum and colleagues propose moving detail out of the main paper to improve readability while mapping and linking supplementary sections back to corresponding main-text sections.","remaining_difference":"The proposal is cross-disciplinary and conceptual; it does not report a controlled comparison involving claim-centered information-theory result sets.","source_ids":["S4"]},{"name":"Publisher supplementary-material workflow","similarity":"High: Cambridge, IEEE, ACM, and ASME operationalize separate, recoverable supporting files, main-text references, and a main article that retains essential evidence.","remaining_difference":"These policies do not prescribe how authors identify redundant estimator comparisons, nor do they validate a 20% identification-time improvement with noninferior recall.","source_ids":["S2","S3","S5","S6"]}],"overlapping_components":["Move secondary or nonessential results out of the main article","Retain all evidence essential to understanding the central claim","Use explicit in-text references or anchored cross-links to displaced material","Keep displaced tables, figures, derivations, or results recoverable with the published article","Organize supplemental detail in correspondence with the main-text result","Require the main paper to remain complete and interpretable without discretionary supplement reading"],"remaining_contrastive_claim":"For claim-centered result sets in information-theory manuscripts, applying an explicit essentiality test specifically to redundant bound or estimator comparisons will make readers identify the operative evidence at least 20% faster than a complete result section without reducing recall of qualifications.","claim_falsifier":"A prior controlled study using information-theory bound or estimator comparisons with the same cut-versus-complete comparison and identification-time plus qualification-recall outcomes, or a new controlled test showing less than a 20% speed gain or inferior qualification recall, would falsify the remaining claim.","problem_support":"WEAK","recommendation":"REJECT","world_novelty_boundary":"The broad treatment—retain claim-essential material, move nonessential comparisons to a linked and recoverable supplement, and keep the main article standalone—is established scholarly-publishing practice and closely specified by standards and publisher policies. This bounded eight-query, six-source review found no direct controlled study of the narrower information-theory implementation or its stated 20%/noninferiority endpoint, but it also found no discipline-specific evidence establishing that redundant comparator overload is prevalent enough to support the nominated problem."}