{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp04_retrieval_first_paired20_20260802","cell_id":"negative_space_design__tech_ethics_ai_governance","considered_ids":["H4","H5"],"selected_id":"H5","dispositions":[{"hypothesis_id":"H4","lane":"DIFFUSION","reason":"The underlying transient, reversible decluttering mechanism is established safety-critical display practice, and the AI-specific application is insufficiently differentiated for this tournament."},{"hypothesis_id":"H5","lane":"FINALIST","reason":"The critic identifies a narrow, falsifiable residual rule: reserve a stated minimum share of annual AI-pilot capacity exclusively for nondeployment harm inquiry, protect it from live-use commitments, and release it only under explicit criteria. Direct sources support the recognizable capacity-gap problem and each neighboring component without establishing this exact AI-specific combination."}],"selection_reason":"H5 offers the strongest differentiated opportunity: a bounded organization-year governance rule with explicit allocation, use, protection, and release conditions. H4 is excluded because its central mechanism is established practice."}