{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp05_complete_proposal_portfolio20_20260803","cell_id":"deadweight_loss_reduction__material_culture_museum_studies","portfolio_valid":true,"proposal_assessments":[{"proposal_index":1,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Fully specifies the stale loan-slot allocation wedge, preserved loan cap and substantive protections, milestone-based release and waitlist reallocation, bounded pilot, incidence analysis, monitoring, falsifiers, authority, and rollback. Its causal path is stranded quota capacity recovered through conditional reassignment."},{"proposal_index":2,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Fully specifies peak congestion alongside off-peak slack, distinguishes the legitimate occupancy cap from flat pricing, and uses bounded scarcity-linked admission prices with protected inventory and credits. It includes incidence, behavioral response, evidence, authority, monitoring, and rollback."},{"proposal_index":3,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Fully diagnoses a bundled reproduction fee that can block low-marginal-cost reuse, preserves rights and cultural gates plus necessary stewardship funding, and decomposes the charge into justified service tiers. It includes operational boundaries, incidence, uncertainty, behavioral risks, falsifiers, authority, and rollback."},{"proposal_index":4,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Fully separates substantive accession safeguards from serial routing and committee-calendar delay, then applies parallel review, narrowly delegated low-risk decisions, and temporary nonownership custody. Its bounded pilot, authority limits, incidence review, negative tests, monitoring, and sunset preserve the protected purpose."},{"proposal_index":5,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Fully identifies unsupported persistence of temporary administrative holds while excluding independently protected restrictions from automatic expiry. The owned registry, scheduled reauthorization, competent-authority escalation, two-person verification, monitoring, falsifiers, and rollback form a complete and faithful redesign."}],"pairwise_assessments":[{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":2,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 recovers outgoing-loan capacity stranded by nonreleasable borrower reservations through milestone-based slot recycling; Proposal 2 shifts visitor demand between congested and slack exhibition times through access-protected price differentiation."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 repairs a quantity-allocation rule governing scarce physical-loan slots; Proposal 3 removes unjustified components of a monetary charge governing reuse of existing digital images."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 addresses post-approval loan slots stranded by stalled borrowers via reallocation; Proposal 4 addresses pre-acquisition decisions lost to serial review and external deadlines via risk-tiered parallel review and temporary custody."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":5,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 reallocates a fixed outgoing-loan quota when reservations become nonviable; Proposal 5 requires temporary administrative object-use holds to be evidenced, renewed, cleared, or escalated before they persist."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 corrects a time-specific congestion wedge with peak/off-peak admission prices and protected access; Proposal 3 corrects an overbundled reproduction charge with purpose decomposition and marginal-service tiers."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 reallocates visitor attendance across existing exhibition capacity using price signals; Proposal 4 shortens avoidable accession routing while retaining substantive acquisition review and ownership safeguards."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":5,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 concerns visitor congestion caused by uniform timed-admission pricing; Proposal 5 concerns collection uses blocked by indefinitely persistent internal administrative holds."},{"proposal_a":3,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 3 enables eligible digital-image reuse by unbundling authority-set fees; Proposal 4 preserves time-bounded physical acquisition opportunities by parallelizing and risk-tiering accession review."},{"proposal_a":3,"proposal_b":5,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 3 redesigns payment for already eligible digital delivery, with permission gates unchanged; Proposal 5 determines whether an internal administrative restriction on an accessioned object remains justified before any ordinary use approval."},{"proposal_a":4,"proposal_b":5,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 4 repairs delay in deciding whether to acquire offered objects through parallel review, delegated authority, and temporary deposit; Proposal 5 repairs silent persistence of temporary holds on objects already in the collection through expiry and reauthorization governance."}],"replacement_indices":[],"rationale":"All five proposals are operationally complete and preserve legitimate safety, rights, cultural-authority, access, capacity, funding, and governance purposes while targeting a specific avoidable wedge. The portfolio covers five independent opportunities: stale allocation of outgoing-loan slots, time-specific visitor congestion under flat admission pricing, overbundled digital reproduction fees, serial accession approval delay, and indefinite persistence of temporary administrative use holds. Although several proposals share cross-cutting assessment, pilot, and monitoring components required by the archetype, no pair has the same affected problem, core intervention, and causal path."}