{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp05_complete_proposal_portfolio20_20260803","cell_id":"deadweight_loss_reduction__robotics_automation","portfolio_valid":true,"proposal_assessments":[{"proposal_index":1,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally specifies the entitlement wedge, preserved safety cap, expiring-reservation redesign, incidence, gaming checks, authority, bounded replay, pilot, falsifiers, and rollback. Its causal path is stranded validation capacity caused by nontransferable slot ownership."},{"proposal_index":2,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally distinguishes redundant approval scope from indispensable safety assurance and specifies independent classification, conservative full-review defaults, evidence, monitoring, expiry, and rollback. Its causal path is beneficial updates deterred by an undifferentiated revalidation rule."},{"proposal_index":3,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Correctly separates an internal transfer from behavioral welfare loss and preserves funding for safety and shared services through a two-part, cost-causal chargeback. It includes incidence, authority, shadow accounting, fiscal safeguards, falsifiers, and reversion."},{"proposal_index":4,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Targets silent persistence of temporary runtime constraints rather than valid safety limits. Positive hazard clearance, scheduled re-justification, existing map validation, bounded replay, protected-outcome monitoring, and immediate restoration make the intervention complete and faithful."},{"proposal_index":5,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Defines a genuine asset-task matching wedge rather than raw scarcity or forced reuse. Verified dossiers, hard compatibility gates, lifecycle assessment, bilateral authority, destination-specific safeguards, shadow matching, quarantine, falsifiers, and exit paths make it operationally complete."}],"pairwise_assessments":[{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":2,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 reallocates usable validation appointments stranded by departmental entitlements; proposal 2 changes the evidence and approval scope for isolated software updates. One repairs capacity allocation, while the other repairs a coarse review rule."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 addresses idle validation slots through expiring reservations; proposal 3 addresses robot-project entry distorted by a uniform onboarding charge through cost-causal funding and price redesign."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 repairs nontransferable scheduling entitlements before validation; proposal 4 reviews already-deployed runtime route restrictions that persist after temporary hazards end."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":5,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 reallocates time slots within a validation cell using an eligibility-gated waitlist; proposal 5 creates cross-site compatibility matching between releasable physical robots and destination tasks."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 reduces overbroad revalidation for bounded software changes through evidence-gated approval; proposal 3 redesigns the administered financial charge affecting whether new robot deployments enter."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 creates a proportionate approval pathway for future software changes; proposal 4 creates recurring disposition of existing temporary geofences and speed caps while retaining the ordinary map-change validation pathway."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":5,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 addresses excessive evidence required for approving software updates; proposal 5 addresses failure to identify and verify feasible cross-site robot redeployments, without abbreviating any destination approval."},{"proposal_a":3,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 3 changes a project-entry price and its shared-service funding structure; proposal 4 sunsets obsolete runtime restrictions after affirmative hazard clearance."},{"proposal_a":3,"proposal_b":5,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 3 corrects marginal project decisions distorted by average onboarding charges; proposal 5 pools asset supply and task demand to overcome compatibility and organizational matching failure without changing charges."},{"proposal_a":4,"proposal_b":5,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 4 restores routing options by retiring affirmatively obsolete operating constraints; proposal 5 enables safe hardware redeployment by matching idle robots with compatible needs before transfer and recommissioning."}],"replacement_indices":[],"rationale":"All five proposals identify a specific avoidable wedge, distinguish it from legitimate safety or governance constraints, prescribe a matched structural redesign, expose affected-party incidence and uncertainty, and provide bounded evidence, monitoring, authority, falsification, and rollback. Their affected problems, primary interventions, and causal paths are mutually independent: validation-slot entitlement, software-change approval scope, onboarding-price design, persistence of temporary runtime restrictions, and cross-site asset-task matching."}