{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp05_complete_proposal_portfolio20_20260803","cell_id":"invariant_mode_decomposition_design__biology_ecology","portfolio_valid":true,"proposal_assessments":[{"proposal_index":1,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally complete: it defines the lake-state transition, modal decision rule, bounded controls, authority, safeguards, falsifiers, and contained validation. Its intervention follows the archetype from coupled-state decomposition through stability and sensitivity analysis to residual, gap, and drift gates."},{"proposal_index":2,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally complete and faithful: it decomposes a stage-by-zone plant transition, identifies a replenishment mode, maps timed manual controls into modal leverage, and conditions validation on reconstruction and basis-validity checks. The invasive seedbank problem and lifecycle-treatment intervention are distinct from the other proposals."},{"proposal_index":3,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally complete and faithful: it decomposes host-stage–reservoir–pond pathogen dynamics and uses modal loadings and sensitivity to allocate a discretionary assay budget, with minimum coverage and explicit quality, welfare, residual, gap, and drift gates. Its purpose is observability rather than biological control."},{"proposal_index":4,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally complete and faithful: it treats a complete breeding plan as a founder-contribution transformation, separates neutral from concentration modes, tests feasible plan substitutions in modal coordinates, and includes retrospective reconstruction, governance, and non-operative validation. The intervention changes reproductive planning rather than monitoring or ecological treatment."},{"proposal_index":5,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally complete and faithful: it decomposes stage-specific organoid differentiation, identifies reproducible off-target modes, maps permitted cue changes to those modes, screens combinations with a bounded reduced-order model, and validates with residual, safety, gap, and drift checks. Its cellular target and molecular-cue intervention are independently adoptable."}],"pairwise_assessments":[{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":2,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 manages coupled lake bloom–hypoxia dynamics through nutrient reduction and mixing; proposal 2 suppresses invasive-plant seedbank replenishment through timed seed capture, seedling removal, and clipping."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 alters lake ecological dynamics, whereas proposal 3 reallocates diagnostic sampling to improve observability of wildlife-pathogen dynamics without manipulating the pathogen process."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 controls physicochemical and food-web dynamics in a lake; proposal 4 governs how breeding, retention, and transfers transform founder contributions across breeding cycles."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":5,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 uses watershed and mechanical controls to oppose an ecosystem failure mode; proposal 5 changes laboratory differentiation-cue schedules to damp coupled off-target cellular states."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 intervenes on an invasive plant's lifecycle to reduce replenishment; proposal 3 changes where assays are collected to observe a pathogen mode under a fixed sampling budget."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 suppresses an unwanted wild population through physical lifecycle treatments; proposal 4 preserves founder representation in a managed conservation population through pairing, retention, and transfer planning."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":5,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 interrupts seedbank and reproductive transfers in invasive plants using manual controls; proposal 5 steers organoid cell-state transitions using bounded molecular-cue changes."},{"proposal_a":3,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 3 optimizes measurement allocation for pathogen-mode observability; proposal 4 changes the biological transition through an advisory conservation-breeding portfolio."},{"proposal_a":3,"proposal_b":5,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 3 reallocates field and laboratory assays without altering disease dynamics; proposal 5 experimentally changes differentiation cues to alter coupled cellular dynamics."},{"proposal_a":4,"proposal_b":5,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 4 manages intergenerational founder-contribution balance through animal breeding decisions; proposal 5 manages within-batch somatic differentiation through research-culture cue schedules."}],"replacement_indices":[],"rationale":"All five proposals specify an explicit coupled transformation and state, extract and interpret modes and scalar responses, connect action-relevant modes to a concrete decision, and retain residual, conditioning, spectral-gap, drift, scope, safety, authority, and falsification checks. Their affected problems, operational interventions, and causal paths differ materially across lake management, invasive-plant control, pathogen surveillance, conservation breeding, and organoid differentiation. Shared use of the required modal archetype is structural fidelity, not duplication."}