{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp05_complete_proposal_portfolio20_20260803","cell_id":"invariant_mode_decomposition_design__literature_literary_theory","portfolio_valid":true,"proposal_assessments":[{"proposal_index":1,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Specifies actors, measurable revision states, a bounded round-to-round transformation, modal extraction and ranking, edit-level action mapping, residual and drift checks, authority limits, falsifiers, and a feasible retrospective test. Its causal path targets coupled prose-feature drift during creative revision."},{"proposal_index":2,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationalizes claim dependencies as a propagation operator, connects persistent modes to bounded verification actions, and includes reconstruction, perturbation, re-estimation, governance, rivals, falsifiers, and a held-out pilot. It addresses scholarly-apparatus inconsistency rather than manuscript revision."},{"proposal_index":3,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Defines a local block-to-block seminar transformation, action-relevant modal criteria, a reversible facilitation reset, outcome validation, residual and drift safeguards, consent boundaries, and prospective falsification. It addresses conversational convergence in pedagogy through facilitation."},{"proposal_index":4,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Models the explicit feedback from genre memberships to prototypes and back through a local Jacobian, then maps unstable modes to concrete calibration controls. It supplies thresholds, residual checks, re-estimation, governance, comparisons, and a sandbox test for corpus-release stability."},{"proposal_index":5,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Defines bounded performance states and an approximate retelling transition, uses modal persistence and reconstruction to diagnose collection coverage, and maps permitted contexts to additional sampling. Its rights-aware controls, residual visibility, falsifiers, and held-out audit make the opportunity operational despite the explicitly local and provisional transformation."}],"pairwise_assessments":[{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":2,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 detects ambiguity-eroding coupled edits and offers alternative manuscript batches; proposal 2 detects propagated verification obligations and orders source checks across a critical edition."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 governs asynchronous revision of prose to preserve author-defined narratorial ambiguity; proposal 3 governs live seminar dynamics and interrupts unsupported conversational convergence with an evidence reset."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 changes editorial batch selection for a creative manuscript; proposal 4 temporarily gates disputed metadata contributions to stop self-reinforcing genre-prototype recalibration."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":5,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 controls proposed edits to a fixed manuscript; proposal 5 allocates rights-approved recording opportunities to improve modal coverage of repeated living performances without altering their content."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 addresses inconsistency propagated through a claim-dependency graph by prioritizing verification; proposal 3 addresses discussion-induced interpretive narrowing by changing facilitation at a threshold."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 acts on documentary claims and their rechecking dependencies; proposal 4 acts on work–genre membership feedback and prototype-contribution rules."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":5,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 uses network modes to reconcile a critical apparatus through source checking; proposal 5 uses temporal performance modes to select additional authorized archival observations."},{"proposal_a":3,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 3 resets a live human discussion when participation-and-evidence dynamics mimic resolution; proposal 4 gates an automated metadata recalibration when classification feedback destabilizes genre cohorts."},{"proposal_a":3,"proposal_b":5,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 3 intervenes in an ongoing seminar trajectory to restore examination of counterevidence; proposal 5 does not redirect performances and instead changes the archive's future sampling allocation under community authorization."},{"proposal_a":4,"proposal_b":5,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 4 controls endogenous feedback in genre classification by withholding disputed prototype contributions; proposal 5 addresses incomplete observation of narrative transformation by inviting additional recordings in permitted contexts."}],"replacement_indices":[],"rationale":"All five proposals provide explicit state representations and locally bounded transformations, extract and rank coupled modes by scalar behavior, translate supported modes into consequential decisions, preserve residuals, and retire or re-estimate modes after threshold failure or drift. Their affected problems, interventions, and causal paths are mutually distinct: creative-manuscript revision, critical-edition verification, seminar facilitation, genre-metadata recalibration, and living-archive sampling. Similar use of the shared modal toolkit is archetype fidelity rather than duplication."}