{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp05_complete_proposal_portfolio20_20260803","cell_id":"layer_decay_and_expiration_management__environmental_climate","portfolio_valid":true,"proposal_assessments":[{"proposal_index":1,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally specifies identities, inspection TTLs, risk triage, ecological dependency gates, differentiated dispositions, expiring exceptions, tombstones, authority limits, falsifiers, and a bounded evidence step. It faithfully governs successive installed restoration-material layers without making age alone a removal trigger, and its habitat-facing physical-retirement problem is distinct from the other four opportunities."},{"proposal_index":2,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Fully defines edition identity, authority expiration, supersession, retention classes, dependency tracing, archival tiering, restoration tests, tombstones, decision rights, safeguards, and validation. Its causal target is stale decision authority in accumulated digital hazard-map editions while preserving reproducibility, distinct from physical materials, specimens, and executable rules."},{"proposal_index":3,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Provides an actionable specimen register, review states, preservation vetoes, dependency checks, compatible storage tiers, reversible disposition quarantine, retrieval drills, tombstones, authorization, risks, and falsification criteria. It faithfully manages aging physical evidence under freezer-capacity and scientific-irreplaceability constraints and is not merely another site-material or digital-record variant."},{"proposal_index":4,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Specifies patch identity across operational locations, expiry-to-review, stale-copy detection, dependency-gated disablement, nonproduction quarantine, successor markers, isolated reconstruction tests, competent authority, safety exclusions, and evidence tests. Its affected problem and causal path concern obsolete emergency rules retaining executable influence over water operations, materially distinct from map discovery and archival authority."},{"proposal_index":5,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationalizes georeferenced sediment strata, age and uncertainty indices, review triggers, ranked characterization, structural and contaminant dependency gates, bounded-cell disposition, excavated-material quarantine, tombstones, revalidation, authority, and falsifiers. It faithfully addresses naturally deposited heterogeneous matter and capacity loss through stratum-specific field management, distinct from installed mats and archived specimens."}],"pairwise_assessments":[{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":2,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 governs physically embedded erosion-control installations whose removal can destabilize habitat; Proposal 2 expires the current authority of digital hazard-map editions while preserving reference-resolvable historical evidence."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 uses field mapping and ecological dependency review for installed bank materials; Proposal 3 uses accession governance, preservation-compatible storage tiering, and disposition quarantine for laboratory specimens."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 prevents unmanaged accumulation or unsafe extraction of physical restoration mats; Proposal 4 prevents temporary drought directives from remaining executable after their authority or assumptions expire."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":5,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 manages discrete manufactured layers installed during restoration repairs; Proposal 5 manages naturally accumulated sediment strata through characterization, hydraulic-capacity assessment, and bounded dredging decisions."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 separates current guidance from historical digital map editions through supersession and archival restoration; Proposal 3 manages finite-capacity custody and possible destruction of irreplaceable physical specimens."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 addresses users discovering obsolete analytical map editions and demotes their informational authority; Proposal 4 reconciles distributed emergency rule patches and safely removes their capacity to affect live operations."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":5,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 governs versioned digital climate information and reproducibility; Proposal 5 governs in-situ sediment accumulation, contaminant isolation, pond capacity, and physical excavation boundaries."},{"proposal_a":3,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 3 manages stored environmental specimens through scientific preservation vetoes and physical disposition controls; Proposal 4 manages the executable status of operational directives through safe disablement and simulation."},{"proposal_a":3,"proposal_b":5,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 3 targets individually accessioned specimens already held in laboratory storage; Proposal 5 targets the pond's in-situ depositional stack and uses cells, stratigraphic boundaries, and dredging or isolation pathways."},{"proposal_a":4,"proposal_b":5,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 4 bounds an organizational and technical stack of emergency operating rules; Proposal 5 bounds heterogeneous physical sediment accumulation through field characterization and dependency-gated material management."}],"replacement_indices":[],"rationale":"All five proposals are operationally complete and preserve the archetype's essential causal structure: identifiable sequential deposits, explicit aging or review triggers, differentiated lifecycle states, dependency and exception checks, accountable disposition, and retained reconstruction paths. Each opportunity also differs from every other in the affected problem, operative intervention, and causal path. Shared lifecycle components express the required archetype rather than duplication; none is merely a renamed variant, added feature, narrower population, or implementation detail of another proposal."}