{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp05_complete_proposal_portfolio20_20260803","cell_id":"layer_decay_and_expiration_management__physics","portfolio_valid":false,"proposal_assessments":[{"proposal_index":1,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally complete and faithful: shot-deposited films are inventoried, measured, reviewed, dependency-checked, quarantined, differentially preserved or removed, and represented by durable lineage after cleaning or disposal. It establishes the immutable physical-deposit baseline."},{"proposal_index":2,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally complete and faithful. It addresses sequential simulation configurations whose statistical membership and retention value diverge, using statistical qualification, restart and analysis dependency checks, tiering, executable restoration, and reversible disposition."},{"proposal_index":3,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally complete and faithful. Its central intervention is a bounded default-resolution authority lease for calibration payloads, separated from historical byte retention and reconstruction dependencies."},{"proposal_index":4,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":false,"reason":"Complete and faithful in isolation, but not materially distinct from proposal 3. Both place executable configuration layers under expiring authority leases, remove expired layers from automatic eligibility while retaining them, then apply dependency-gated quarantine, archival replay, and tombstones. Safe-boundary expiry and the accelerator-safety setting are implementation adaptations."},{"proposal_index":5,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":false,"reason":"Complete and faithful in isolation, but not materially distinct from proposal 1. Both govern campaign-indexed physical deposits on replaceable or isolable surfaces through condition measurements, review scoring, dependency and preservation holds, intact quarantine before destructive cleaning or regeneration, and successor-linked tombstones."}],"pairwise_assessments":[{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":2,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 controls contaminant films affecting a physical optical transfer function through shield handling; proposal 2 controls digital Markov-chain states through statistical qualification, storage disposition, and restart-aware preservation."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 retires or preserves deposited physical films after optical-condition review; proposal 3 expires the resolver authority of digital calibration payloads while preserving historical reconstruction stacks."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 addresses matter accumulation and calibration drift on shields; proposal 4 addresses persistent behavioral exceptions in machine-protection logic through fail-safe authorization leases."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":5,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":true,"independent_opportunity":false,"key_difference":"The measured effect differs—optical degradation versus vacuum capture and release—but both use the same physical-deposit carrier lifecycle: campaign indexing, condition review, dependency-gated intact quarantine, destructive surface renewal, and a successor tombstone."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 separates statistically qualified ensemble membership from raw-configuration retention; proposal 3 uses expiring applicability leases to prevent stale calibration payloads from resolving by default."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 manages scientific sample files and restart or reanalysis dependencies; proposal 4 governs temporary live protection permissions whose continued execution requires renewed authorization."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":5,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 governs digital trajectory states through statistical review, tiering, and restoration; proposal 5 governs accumulated gas on cryogenic surfaces through capacity checks, cold isolation, and controlled regeneration."},{"proposal_a":3,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":true,"independent_opportunity":false,"key_difference":"Calibration correctness and accelerator protection are different affected problems, but both interventions are expiring authority leases for executable configuration layers followed by dependency-gated retention, quarantine, replay, and tombstoning. Expiry at a safe operating boundary is an implementation detail of the same intervention."},{"proposal_a":3,"proposal_b":5,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 3 removes stale digital corrections from default resolver authority; proposal 5 retires a physical sorbate inventory through verified replacement capacity, cold quarantine, and destructive warming."},{"proposal_a":4,"proposal_b":5,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 4 bounds authorization of machine-protection rule exceptions; proposal 5 bounds material loading on vacuum capture surfaces through isolation and regeneration."}],"replacement_indices":[4,5],"rationale":"Every proposal is operationally complete and causally faithful to managed layer decay and expiration, but the portfolio is not mutually independent. Proposal 4 is an accelerator-safety restatement of proposal 3's expiring executable-authority lifecycle, and proposal 5 is a cryogenic-vacuum restatement of proposal 1's measured physical-deposit, intact-quarantine, and destructive-renewal lifecycle. Replace indices 4 and 5 with opportunities having different affected problems, core interventions, and causal paths."}