{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp05_complete_proposal_portfolio20_20260803","cell_id":"negative_space_design__astronomy_astrophysics","portfolio_valid":true,"proposal_assessments":[{"proposal_index":1,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally specifies the scheduling problem, bounded protected vacancy, activation and release rules, recoverability, authority, rivals, falsifiers, risks, and retrospective test. Deliberate non-assignment directly creates capacity for late information, preserving the archetype's omission, boundary, meaning, and reintroduction structure."},{"proposal_index":2,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Defines the overlay-interference problem, bounded annotation-free region, exempt warnings, preserved context, exact restoration, governance, falsifiers, and crossover evaluation. Reversible absence of competing marks is the active cause of cleaner morphology inspection."},{"proposal_index":3,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Fully specifies eligibility, evidence packet, protected silence, permitted interruptions, exit trigger, contribution order, accessibility safeguards, authority, counterevidence, and comparative test. Withholding high-power commentary creates the reflective interval that enables independent interpretation."},{"proposal_index":4,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Specifies measurable plotting failures, a predetermined gap rule, distinct absence states, preserved upper limits and rejected samples, model separation, accessibility, rollback, falsifiers, and reader testing. Protected blank geometry prevents unsupported continuity while explicitly communicating what the absence means."},{"proposal_index":5,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Defines configuration pressure, distributed target-free witnesses, exclusion and lock rules, failure and contamination checks, held-out validation, target-cost accounting, authority, rivals, and falsifiers. Deliberate target absence is a protected physical condition that makes contemporaneous background measurable."}],"pairwise_assessments":[{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":2,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 addresses schedule saturation by reserving unassigned observing time so late evidence encounters capacity; proposal 2 addresses graphical contamination by suppressing recoverable overlays in a bounded image region so pixel morphology can be inspected without imposed marks."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 protects temporal operating capacity against premature scheduling; proposal 3 protects pre-discussion silence against premature interpretive framing, producing independent hypotheses rather than insertion capacity."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 leaves future telescope time available for conditional use; proposal 4 leaves unsupported regions of completed-data plots visually blank to prevent false claims of measured continuity."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":5,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 reserves an unassigned time interval that may later receive a transient observation; proposal 5 permanently assigns selected simultaneous apertures to target-free sightlines so their spectra measure and validate background subtraction."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 removes interface marks that perceptually interfere with faint image evidence; proposal 3 temporarily removes spoken interpretation that socially anchors a group's explanations."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 creates an annotation-free moat over valid pixels to separate measurements from interface geometry; proposal 4 breaks measured-line geometry across intervals lacking usable observations to represent evidence boundaries and absence types."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":5,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 changes a review interface by reversibly hiding nonessential annotations; proposal 5 changes an observing configuration by collecting physical spectra through deliberately target-free apertures."},{"proposal_a":3,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 3 uses bounded conversational silence to reduce authority-driven anchoring during anomaly review; proposal 4 uses bounded visual gaps to prevent readers from inferring measurements across unsupported time intervals."},{"proposal_a":3,"proposal_b":5,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 3 modifies scientific-review participation and timing to elicit independent interpretations; proposal 5 reserves physical observing channels to obtain independent background measurements and test subtraction."},{"proposal_a":4,"proposal_b":5,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 4 visually preserves the absence of usable historical measurements so plots do not imply continuity; proposal 5 exploits the absence of intended targets to generate usable simultaneous calibration measurements."}],"replacement_indices":[],"rationale":"All five proposals are operationally complete, preserve deliberate absence as the active causal intervention, include boundaries and meaning-of-absence checks, retain necessary context and recoverability, and specify bounded authority, falsifiers, risks, rivals, and evidence steps. Every pair differs in the affected problem, intervention, and causal path; shared use of negative space is archetype fidelity rather than duplication. No replacement is needed."}