{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp06_four_proposal_generalization60_20260803","source_assessment_id":"computability_boundary_mapping__economics_finance:P1:v0","cell_id":"computability_boundary_mapping__economics_finance","proposal_index":1,"qualification":"EMPIRICAL_PARTNER_CANDIDATE","criteria":{"specific_differentiated_claim":{"status":"YES","reason":"The clearinghouse-specific claim is falsifiable: a parser-enforced bounded fragment plus status-preserving routing should reduce unsupported Boolean solvency approvals relative to simulation-plus-timeout review, without producing an unsound SAFE verdict. Adjacent tools contain many components, but the integrated authorization workflow remains differentiated."},"credible_problem_signal":{"status":"YES","reason":"Regulatory and standards sources substantiate smart-contract software, oracle, dependency, collateral, settlement, and operational risks, while primary research shows that sound analysis can fail to terminate on some contracts. The precise prevalence of forced Boolean timeout handling is unverified, but the external signal is credible rather than speculative."},"identifiable_partner_or_adopter":{"status":"YES","reason":"A derivatives clearing organization or programmable-derivatives platform—specifically its model-risk function and listing committee—is a concrete adopter class with relevant governance authority."},"partner_access_is_necessary":{"status":"YES","reason":"The unresolved premise and comparative claim require proprietary workflow observation, actual contract programs, frozen compiler and settlement semantics, and verification that result labels survive downstream committee systems. Ordinary public research cannot supply these."},"safe_authorized_first_step":{"status":"YES","reason":"The head of model risk can authorize an offline, read-only exercise using frozen de-identified programs and synthetic traces. It is disconnected from listing, trading, margin, collateral, and settlement, preserves committee authority, and has explicit halt and rollback conditions."},"bounded_decisive_empirical_design":{"status":"YES","reason":"The proposed test is capped at 12 contracts, one frozen DSL/compiler, two assets, eight event steps, finite price and balance domains, and no external calls. It directly compares the baseline Boolean workflow with exhaustive and sound-approximate alternatives and preregisters coverage, soundness, false-alarm, non-result, certification, and label-preservation outcomes."},"no_material_negative_gate":{"status":"YES","reason":"No verified pipeline gate is NO: adopter credibility, incremental claim, bounded test, safety and authority, and cost scope pass. The exact problem is UNCERTAIN, which is the partner-resolvable empirical uncertainty rather than a demonstrated contradiction or safety stop."},"not_merely_more_research":{"status":"YES","reason":"The next action is a specified partnered audit and controlled comparison with fixed inputs, metrics, proof checks, success thresholds, and explicit falsifiers—not an open-ended request for additional research."}},"uncertainty_types":["PROBLEM_PREVALENCE","ADOPTER_PULL","INCREMENTAL_EFFECT","WORKFLOW_FIT","DATA_ACCESS","COST_SCOPE"],"partner_profile":"One willing derivatives clearing organization or programmable-derivatives platform that has a model-risk owner, listing or approval committee, programmable contract workflow, and authority to release a small de-identified corpus for offline review.","required_access":"Up to 12 representative de-identified contract programs; the current simulation, timeout, and decision workflow; one frozen DSL/compiler version; executable settlement and numeric semantics; declared oracle and event assumptions; downstream result storage, analyst display, committee review, and audit-export paths; and limited model-risk, engineering, quantitative, legal, and independent-reviewer participation.","bounded_empirical_test":"Audit the current workflow and run the same frozen corpus through (A) simulation under the existing runtime-budget and Boolean process, (B) parser-enforced exhaustive finite-state analysis, and (C) a sound over-approximation preserving UNKNOWN and POSSIBLE_BREACH. Independently check the unrestricted reduction, semantic preservation, fragment enforcement, solver termination and correctness, and abstraction soundness. Measure certified coverage, runtime, abstraction false alarms against bounded exhaustive truth, UNKNOWN/OUT_OF_SCOPE rates, baseline approvals lacking certificates, and end-to-end label preservation.","success_condition":"No concrete bounded breach receives SAFE; fragment membership cannot be bypassed; all seven statuses remain distinct through audit export; at least 3 of 12 economically faithful cases obtain a usable certified result; and the gated workflow identifies or prevents at least one baseline Boolean approval lacking a valid certificate while retaining committee control.","falsification_condition":"Falsify the problem premise if the partner audit shows that all admitted contracts already belong to an enforced total bounded language and that timeout, unsupported input, unknown, and system failure are never promoted to semantic verdicts. Falsify the intervention if any bounded breach receives SAFE, fragment checks are bypassable, labels collapse downstream, independent proof obligations fail, or fewer than 3 of 12 economically faithful cases receive a usable certified result.","rationale":"This is an appropriate empirical-partner lane because credible adjacent evidence and a concrete adopter exist, yet the central operational premise and incremental benefit depend on proprietary contract semantics, workflow behavior, and organizational label preservation. The proposed offline comparison is safe, bounded, comparator-based, and capable of either validating the claimed governance advantage or decisively falsifying the problem or intervention."}