{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp06_four_proposal_generalization60_20260803","cell_id":"catalytic_pathway_enablement__accounting_auditing","portfolio_valid":true,"proposal_assessments":[{"proposal_index":1,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally specifies the journal-population transformation, recurring interpretation/reconciliation barrier, reusable gateway, selective intake and exception routing, turnover/capacity measures, counterfactual baseline, regeneration, deactivation, authority limits, and bounded test. Its causal path is canonicalization and integrity validation of ledger exports without changing audit standards."},{"proposal_index":2,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally specifies bilateral supplier-balance reconciliation, the repeated search/trust/translation barrier, a reusable governed broker, selective documentary routing, capacity and turnover measurement, relationship regeneration, neutrality, authority boundaries, and a matched pilot. Its leverage comes from reused relational capital rather than data transformation or added labor."},{"proposal_index":3,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally specifies the conversion of eligible lease amendments into reviewed accounting packages, the repeated technical-analysis reconstruction barrier, a reusable precedent capsule, semantic eligibility, independent review, turnover/selectivity assays, refresh and retirement, unchanged accounting authority, and a holdout test. Its causal path carries forward a validated reasoning structure rather than canonicalizing source data."},{"proposal_index":4,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally specifies movement of authorized control remediations into a retest-ready intermediate state, the recurring safe-environment and evidence-observation setup barrier, a reusable segregated proving cell, selective admission, fixture turnover and reset, capacity monitoring, assurance neutrality, deactivation, and outcome-sealed replay. It preserves formal tester independence and does not substitute rehearsal for assurance."}],"pairwise_assessments":[{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":2,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 converts internal ledger exports through a software/schema gateway to remove repeated semantic and completeness-preparation work; proposal 2 reconciles cross-organizational balances through a standing human-institutional broker that reuses authenticated relationships and translation capacity."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 addresses audit-data population readiness through canonical mapping and reconciliation automation; proposal 3 addresses repetitive technical-accounting analysis through selective reuse of a validated lease-reasoning and calculation capsule. Although both use templates and automation, their affected objects, facilitator designs, outputs, authority boundaries, and causal paths differ materially."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 lowers the recurring data-interpretation barrier before journal testing using a canonicalization gateway; proposal 4 lowers the recurring environment-and-observation setup barrier before control retesting using a segregated proving cell that creates a safe intermediate state."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 uses reusable trust, contacts, and convening to turn supplier discrepancies into bilateral evidence schedules; proposal 3 uses a reusable validated reasoning artifact to turn routine lease amendments into accounting-treatment packages."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 resolves documentary coordination across buyer-supplier boundaries through a governed broker; proposal 4 rehearses control remediations in a reusable test environment to expose execution and evidence defects before independent retesting."},{"proposal_a":3,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 3 accelerates routine accounting conclusions by inheriting a prevalidated fact-to-treatment proof; proposal 4 accelerates remediation learning by repeatedly constructing and resetting a representative observation state without carrying forward or issuing an assurance conclusion."}],"replacement_indices":[],"rationale":"Every proposal is operationally complete and preserves the archetype's defining closed cycle: a feasible recurring transformation, identified activation barrier, separable reusable facilitator, selective interface, measurable turnover and counterfactual effect, capacity limits, monitoring for degradation and side paths, regeneration or retirement, and neutrality toward substantive standards and authority. All six pairs differ simultaneously in the affected problem, intervention, and causal path; shared governance and monitoring components reflect archetype fidelity rather than duplication."}