{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp06_four_proposal_generalization60_20260803","cell_id":"catalytic_pathway_enablement__aviation_aeronautics","portfolio_valid":true,"proposal_assessments":[{"proposal_index":1,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally complete: it specifies the recurring conformity-packet transformation, evidence-reconciliation barrier, reusable data/template/rules/specialist facilitator, bounded interface, selectivity, turnover, saturation, regeneration, counterfactual, authority boundary, halt rules, and a shadow-mode test. Its causal claim depends on repeated facilitator reuse without relaxing return-to-service standards, and its informational maintenance intervention is distinct from the physical and interorganizational proposals."},{"proposal_index":2,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally complete: it defines the ozone-conversion target and operating envelope, immobilized reusable catalyst, airflow interface, selectivity and byproduct tests, active-capacity measures, poisoning detection, regeneration and retirement, inert and blank counterfactuals, safety shutdowns, and a bounded rig experiment. It instantiates literal repeated catalytic turnover and is materially distinct as a chemical cabin-air treatment intervention."},{"proposal_index":3,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally complete: it specifies the laminar-to-attached-turbulent transition, scale-dependent activation barrier, retained roughness facilitator, eligible flow envelope, transition and attachment diagnostics, repeated-use capacity, contamination monitoring, cleaning and requalification, smooth-insert control, retirement thresholds, and tunnel safety limits. The cassette repeatedly supplies a localized perturbation pathway rather than the bulk energy of turbulence, making it faithful and distinct as an aerodynamic state-transition intervention."},{"proposal_index":4,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally complete: it defines the fragmented-request-to-shared-status transformation, recurring search/trust/translation barrier, standing reusable broker, authenticated interface, selective admission and escalation, concurrent-load limits, provenance and expiry controls, post-case regeneration, authority constraints, counterfactual procedure, halt conditions, and tabletop test. It preserves operational decision rights and is distinct as an institutional coordination intervention."}],"pairwise_assessments":[{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":2,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 reduces recurring configuration-evidence reconstruction with a governed informational review lane; proposal 2 accelerates molecular ozone decomposition with an immobilized material catalyst in an air stream."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 transforms maintenance records into a conformity packet through data reconciliation and bounded expertise; proposal 3 transforms a boundary-layer flow state through a retained micro-roughness disturbance interface."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 resolves technical configuration evidence for an unchanged return-to-service decision using rules, templates, and exception review; proposal 4 resolves cross-organizational diversion coordination using maintained relationships, authenticated parallel outreach, and a shared status workspace."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Both use retained interfaces exposed to airflow, but proposal 2 uses catalytic surface chemistry to change molecular composition for cabin-air quality, whereas proposal 3 uses calibrated surface geometry to trigger a fluid-instability transition for wind-tunnel boundary conditions; their facilitators and causal paths are not interchangeable."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 is a physical catalyst cartridge causing repeated ozone conversion through active-site contact; proposal 4 is a governed human-institutional broker reducing repeated search, trust, translation, and synchronization costs."},{"proposal_a":3,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 3 enables aerodynamic transition through localized roughness-induced instability on a test model; proposal 4 enables diversion coordination through an authenticated relationship network and parallel institutional handoffs."}],"replacement_indices":[],"rationale":"Every proposal is operationally complete and preserves the archetype's defining closed cycle: a feasible recurring transformation, identified barrier, reusable selective facilitator, explicit interface, measurable turnover and counterfactual, capacity and interference controls, regeneration or retirement, side-path safeguards, and unchanged authorization boundary. All six pairs differ in affected problem, concrete intervention, and causal path. Shared monitoring, interface, assay, and regeneration components are archetype invariants rather than evidence of duplicated opportunities."}