{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp06_four_proposal_generalization60_20260803","cell_id":"catalytic_pathway_enablement__film_media_production","portfolio_valid":true,"proposal_assessments":[{"proposal_index":1,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally complete: it specifies the eligible VFX-turnover transformation, recurring evidence-assembly barrier, reusable capsule gateway, interface, selectivity, capacity, regeneration, counterfactual assay, safeguards, authority, falsifiers, and bounded probe. Its catalyst is separable and reusable rather than added labor or relaxed acceptance criteria."},{"proposal_index":2,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally complete and faithful: a governed intermediary repeatedly lowers contact, trust, and translation barriers while preserving voluntary consent and permit authority. It explicitly covers eligibility, turnover, saturation, relational regeneration, conflict controls, neutrality, falsification, and a bounded test. Relational capital—not digital packaging—is the reusable facilitator."},{"proposal_index":3,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally complete and faithful: the reusable dock, validated scene-state manifest, physical interfaces, sequencing, and exception lane lower repeated reconstruction and coordination burdens across take resets. Consumables and labor are correctly treated as cofactors, while selectivity, regeneration, capacity, authority, safety, counterfactual measurement, and falsifiers are explicit."},{"proposal_index":4,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally complete and faithful: a fixed metrology and profile-generation gate repeatedly converts supported equipment configurations into independently validated registrations. It includes eligibility, withheld validation, capacity, inhibitor screening, known-reference regeneration, retirement, neutrality, governance, falsification, and a safe isolated probe."}],"pairwise_assessments":[{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":2,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 addresses repeated technical asset-and-metadata assembly with a digital validation and packaging gateway; proposal 2 addresses recurring cross-party contact, trust, and interpretation with a neutral relationship relay. Their outputs, actors, failure modes, and causal paths differ."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 converts edit decisions into vendor-accepted technical packages by automating evidence assembly; proposal 3 restores disturbed physical scene states by coordinating department-specific reset work through a fixed dock. Neither intervention is a feature or implementation variant of the other."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Although both use versioned interfaces and automation, proposal 1 removes recurring file-package reconstruction, whereas proposal 4 removes recurring physical-digital measurement and registration work through a fixed metrology station and withheld validation. The shared supporting mechanisms do not make the interventions the same."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 enables voluntary property decisions by reusing governed relationships and translation protocols; proposal 3 enables repeatable camera-ready restoration by reusing scene-state references, fixtures, and dependency sequencing. One acts on institutional trust, the other on physical continuity coordination."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 is an accountable human-institutional brokerage pathway for location access; proposal 4 is an instrumented calibration pathway for equipment registration. Consent and relationship maintenance are causally separate from measurement, profile fitting, and alignment validation."},{"proposal_a":3,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 3 repeatedly returns one disturbed scene setup to an approved continuity state through multi-department coordination; proposal 4 converts varying supported camera-tracking configurations into validated registration profiles through metrology. Their transformations, interfaces, capacity units, and validation evidence are materially different."}],"replacement_indices":[],"rationale":"Every proposal is operationally complete and preserves the archetype's defining closed catalytic cycle: a feasible recurring transformation, identified barrier, separable reusable facilitator, selective interface, measurable turnover, capacity controls, regeneration or retirement, counterfactual validation, and neutrality safeguards. All six pairs differ in affected problem, intervention, and causal pathway, so the four opportunities are mutually independent and no replacement is needed."}