{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp06_four_proposal_generalization60_20260803","cell_id":"catalytic_pathway_enablement__futurism_foresight","portfolio_valid":true,"proposal_assessments":[{"proposal_index":1,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally specifies the dossier-to-implication transformation, recurring reconstruction barrier, reusable kernel, selective interface, turnover and capacity measures, regeneration, counterfactual probe, safeguards, authority, and falsifiers. Its causal path is repeated informational transformation through a versioned facilitator."},{"proposal_index":2,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally specifies question eligibility, maintained relationships and elicitation infrastructure, expert-time cofactors, turnover, saturation, regeneration, neutrality, participant protections, baseline, probe, and falsifiers. The standing relay repeatedly lowers search, trust, translation, and convening barriers without supplying the judgments."},{"proposal_index":3,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally specifies a fixed modular rehearsal interface, compatible scenario substrate, bounded contact window, cofactors, instrumentation, reset and recovery, capacity, selectivity, safety controls, matched baseline, and second-cycle turnover test. Its facilitator is a resettable simulation environment that converts scenarios into observed decision evidence."},{"proposal_index":4,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally specifies eligible contingency concepts, synchronized specialist review, unchanged substantive standards, explicit outputs and escalation, capacity limits, reviewer regeneration, neutrality, authority boundaries, baseline, probe, and falsifiers. The cell repeatedly lowers cross-department review coordination and handoff burdens without granting feasibility or approval."}],"pairwise_assessments":[{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":2,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 addresses repeated evidentiary translation of collected signals with a software-and-template kernel; proposal 2 addresses repeated expert discovery, trust, and elicitation setup with a governed relationship-based convener."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 converts signal dossiers into implication cards through informational validation; proposal 3 converts approved scenarios into behavioral evidence through embodied rehearsal in a resettable modular environment."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 resolves recurring signal-analysis reconstruction with an automated informational kernel; proposal 4 resolves cross-functional readiness-review coordination for endorsed options with a rotating specialist cell."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 elicits distributed external judgment by reusing relationships and controlled-feedback procedures; proposal 3 tests existing contingency decisions by reusing simulation, inject, logging, and observation infrastructure."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 brokers participation and anonymized iterative judgment for unresolved uncertainty questions; proposal 4 synchronizes independent municipal assurance reviews to prepare already-endorsed contingency options."},{"proposal_a":3,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 3 lowers bespoke exercise-construction costs and produces observed decision traces; proposal 4 lowers sequential administrative-review friction and produces nonbinding readiness dossiers without simulation."}],"replacement_indices":[],"rationale":"All four proposals define feasible recurring transformations, identify distinct repeated barriers, use genuinely reusable and separable facilitators, preserve substantive authorization boundaries, measure turnover and selectivity against credible baselines, meter capacity, monitor inhibition and side paths, and include regeneration or retirement. Their affected problems, interventions, and causal paths are independently different: signal translation, expert elicitation, scenario rehearsal, and contingency-option preflight. No proposal is merely a renamed variant, added feature, narrower population, or implementation detail of another."}