{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp06_four_proposal_generalization60_20260803","cell_id":"catalytic_pathway_enablement__religious_studies_theology","portfolio_valid":true,"proposal_assessments":[{"proposal_index":1,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally specifies the recurring source-use-plan transformation, repeated context and trust barrier, reusable rotating gateway, selective intake and rerouting, capacity limits, turnover evidence, regeneration, deactivation, and unchanged access and interpretive authority. Its problem and brokerage-centered pathway are distinct from the other three."},{"proposal_index":2,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally specifies claim-to-consequence-dossier conversion through a reusable scoped proposition graph and traversal service, with eligibility, counterfactual measurement, exception review, saturation controls, recalibration, retirement, and neutrality toward doctrinal truth. It addresses doctrinal dependency tracing rather than source preparation, record annotation, or chronology."},{"proposal_index":3,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally specifies authorized-record-to-layered-annotation conversion through a reusable grammar, alignment macro, calibrated annotators, and specialist exception lane, including selectivity, capacity, turnover, recovery, rollback, and authority safeguards. Its segmentation and multimodal-representation problem is independently adoptable."},{"proposal_index":4,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally specifies date-expression-to-uncertainty-bounded-concordance conversion through reusable scoped calendar modules and an uncertainty engine, with explicit cofactors, compatibility screening, turnover measurement, discrepancy-driven regeneration, retirement, and neutrality toward historicity and calendrical authority. Its chronological-conversion pathway is distinct from all others."}],"pairwise_assessments":[{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":2,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 lowers provenance, trust, access-interpretation, and referral burdens with a human source-context gateway; proposal 2 lowers doctrinal dependency-reconstruction burden with a proposition graph and bounded traversal service."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 prepares an ethical and contextual source-use plan through maintained relationships and specialist brokerage; proposal 3 transforms an already-authorized empirical record into a layered temporal annotation through a grammar, alignment automation, and calibrated adjudication."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 addresses contextual preparation and contact routing for living-tradition materials; proposal 4 addresses repeated calendar-rule reconstruction by converting an accessible date expression into uncertainty-preserving chronological intervals."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 traces conceptual consequences of a doctrinal proposition using curated dependency relationships; proposal 3 segments and aligns empirical ritual records using a multilayer annotation bench without evaluating doctrinal entailments."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 produces non-authoritative consequence questions by graph traversal over doctrinal loci; proposal 4 performs rule-bounded calendrical conversion with cofactor checks and explicit uncertainty propagation."},{"proposal_a":3,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 3 resolves recurring multimodal segmentation, alignment, and coding setup to produce an annotated ritual-event representation; proposal 4 resolves recurring calendar reconstruction and arithmetic to produce candidate chronological intervals. Their shared use of templates and automation is archetype-level structure, not the same intervention."}],"replacement_indices":[],"rationale":"All four proposals define feasible recurring transformations, identify specific repeated activation burdens, employ reusable selective facilitators that release outputs and return to service, meter inflow to active capacity, measure turnover and off-target outcomes against credible baselines, regenerate or retire degraded capacity, and preserve substantive safeguards and authority. Across all six pairs, the affected problems, interventions, and causal paths differ materially; none is merely a renamed variant, added feature, narrower population, or implementation detail of another."}