{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp06_four_proposal_generalization60_20260803","cell_id":"predictive_residual_processing__accounting_auditing","portfolio_valid":true,"proposal_assessments":[{"proposal_index":1,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally specifies a frozen account-roll-forward predictor, structured and precision-weighted residual review, reconstructibility, bounded updating, version synchronization, independent full-workpaper sampling, protected bypasses, and full-review fallback. Its affected problem is reviewer-attention overload in recurring account reconciliations."},{"proposal_index":2,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally specifies matched bilateral predictors, signed residual exchange, counterparty reconstruction, heartbeats, synchronization, learning governance, independent complete-schedule audits, and fallback. It addresses cross-entity coordination and reciprocal-booking mismatch through a shared communication protocol, not an internal review queue."},{"proposal_index":3,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally specifies prospective control-evidence envelopes, independently observed execution metadata, structured residuals, consequence-aware routing, model revision, raw evidence inspection, and decompression. It targets delayed detection of control-operation and evidence-lineage changes, without treating prediction matches as control-effectiveness conclusions."},{"proposal_index":4,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally specifies a source-aware expected disclosure state, numerical and semantic residuals, reconstructible drafts, synchronized versions, milestone resynchronization, independent full-section review, complete final review, and fallback. It targets change coordination and omission detection in financial-report assembly."}],"pairwise_assessments":[{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":2,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 reallocates reviewer attention over single-entity account reconciliations; Proposal 2 creates a synchronized bilateral residual-exchange protocol between legal entities to resolve reciprocal postings before consolidation."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 predicts account balances and activity for reconciliation review; Proposal 3 predicts recurring control-execution evidence envelopes and routes operation, role, population, parameter, and lineage deviations to control monitoring."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 reconstructs account roll-forwards to prioritize reconciliation review; Proposal 4 reconstructs evolving disclosure units from expected document-and-source state plus numerical and semantic changes to coordinate drafting."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 depends on a jointly synchronized model and residual messages crossing legal-entity boundaries; Proposal 3 locally monitors evidence production for recurring controls and requires no reciprocal counterparty state or booking exchange."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 acts on bilateral transaction and elimination mismatches through counterparty reconstruction; Proposal 4 acts on source-to-disclosure omissions, contradictions, and semantic changes through a document-assembly workflow."},{"proposal_a":3,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 3 monitors whether recurring control evidence and execution metadata depart from an authorized envelope; Proposal 4 coordinates the substantive numerical and narrative content of a periodic financial report and its source dependencies."}],"replacement_indices":[],"rationale":"All four proposals preserve the archetype's essential causal structure: prospective versioned prediction, independent observation, meaningful residual computation, precision- and consequence-weighted propagation through a constrained channel, reconstruction, governed learning, synchronization, raw-state auditing, safety bypasses, and full-signal fallback. They apply that structure to four independently adoptable problems with different intervention loci and causal paths: account-reconciliation review, bilateral intercompany coordination, recurring control-evidence monitoring, and disclosure assembly. None is merely a renamed variant, added feature, narrower population, or implementation detail of another."}