{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp06_four_proposal_generalization60_20260803","source_assessment_id":"predictive_residual_processing__chemistry_materials:P1:v0","cell_id":"predictive_residual_processing__chemistry_materials","proposal_index":1,"qualification":"EMPIRICAL_PARTNER_CANDIDATE","criteria":{"specific_differentiated_claim":{"status":"YES","reason":"The remaining claim is a specific, falsifiable advantage for a checksum-gated, reconstructive Raman residual channel with raw audits, anchors, protected bypasses, and forced fallback, compared with both full-spectrum streaming and conventional lossless compression."},"credible_problem_signal":{"status":"YES","reason":"External evidence credibly signals consequential delays, complex and drift-sensitive Raman spectra, and high-dimensional acquisition or processing burdens, although the prevalence and magnitude of the proposed remote workflow's binding transmission and attention constraint remain unmeasured."},"identifiable_partner_or_adopter":{"status":"YES","reason":"A laboratory operating an existing Raman instrument for remotely supervised reaction monitoring or process analytical technology is a concrete adopter class, with bench chemists and instrumentation owners able to authorize and support the study."},"partner_access_is_necessary":{"status":"YES","reason":"Resolving the remaining uncertainties requires instrument-level spectra and interfaces, actual reaction runs, authorized fault and benign perturbation injection, workflow measurements, and blinded chemist decisions that cannot be obtained through further public research."},"safe_authorized_first_step":{"status":"YES","reason":"The proposed shadow study is non-controlling, retains every raw spectrum and existing alarm as authoritative, uses only chemist-approved non-hazard-escalating perturbations, preserves independent interlocks, and leaves reaction and model authority with responsible humans."},"bounded_decisive_empirical_design":{"status":"YES","reason":"The fixed 12-run, one-instrument, one-reaction-family study compares full-spectrum transmission, conventional lossless compression, and the frozen residual path using predefined resource, fidelity, decision-equivalence, protected-event, and fallback outcomes with explicit rejection rules."},"no_material_negative_gate":{"status":"YES","reason":"No verified pipeline gate is materially NO: the distinct claim, bounded evidence step, and safety/authority gate are YES, while problem, adopter, and cost gates are uncertain and directly addressable through the proposed partnership."},"not_merely_more_research":{"status":"YES","reason":"The next action specifies the partner, access, three comparators, run count, perturbations, blinded reviewers, measurements, and falsification thresholds rather than requesting general investigation."}},"uncertainty_types":["PROBLEM_PREVALENCE","ADOPTER_PULL","INCREMENTAL_EFFECT","WORKFLOW_FIT","DATA_ACCESS","COST_SCOPE"],"partner_profile":"A laboratory with an existing Raman spectrometer and probe used for remotely supervised reaction monitoring or PAT, a suitable non-hazard-escalating reaction family, complete raw-spectrum retention, and participating bench chemists, instrumentation owners, safety personnel, information-security staff, and, if regulated, quality-unit authorization.","required_access":"Authorized access to one Raman instrument and its acquisition interface, complete timestamped raw spectra and context, approximately 12 reaction runs, safe perturbation and data-path fault injection, predictor deployment in shadow mode, baseline transmission/storage/compute measurements, and at least two chemists for blinded review and workflow timing.","bounded_empirical_test":"Preregister a 12-run shadow comparison consisting of eight ordinary and four safely perturbed runs on one instrument, probe geometry, and reaction family. Replay identical acquisitions through full-spectrum streaming, conventional lossless compression with the same review workflow, and the frozen versioned-residual path. Retain all raw data and measure total bytes, storage, compute, audit and fallback traffic, review time, classification and escalation agreement, regional and cumulative reconstruction error, structured residuals, protected-event capture, and forced-raw behavior.","success_condition":"The residual path preserves blinded reaction-state classifications and escalation decisions, captures every protected perturbation, remains within all preregistered regional and cumulative reconstruction budgets, forces raw mode for every injected checksum, heartbeat, calibration, alignment, or detector-quality fault, and produces positive total resource-equivalent savings versus full-spectrum streaming that are materially greater than conventional lossless compression after all prediction, synchronization, audit, fallback, and review costs are included.","falsification_condition":"Falsify the claim if the intended workflow lacks a meaningful baseline transmission or review burden; any protected perturbation is missed; reconstruction causes a materially different chemist decision; any required fault fails to force raw mode; an error budget is exceeded; structured loss appears in raw audits; or governed total resource use is not lower than full-spectrum streaming and materially better than conventional lossless compression.","rationale":"This is an appropriate partnered-research candidate because adjacent prior art leaves a narrow differentiated claim intact, credible external evidence signals a relevant but unquantified problem, and the decisive uncertainties concern live workflow burden, incremental performance, safety-preserving fidelity, and implementation scope. Those questions require authorized laboratory data, equipment access, human review, and fault testing; they cannot be settled by additional ordinary web research."}