{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp06_four_proposal_generalization60_20260803","source_assessment_id":"predictive_residual_processing__chemistry_materials:P4:v0","cell_id":"predictive_residual_processing__chemistry_materials","proposal_index":4,"qualification":"EMPIRICAL_PARTNER_CANDIDATE","criteria":{"specific_differentiated_claim":{"status":"YES","reason":"The proposal makes a bounded, falsifiable claim that a frozen command-conditioned residual path can preserve non-inferior detection and localization versus full raw review while reducing total data and reviewer burden, with mandatory full-signal fallback."},"credible_problem_signal":{"status":"YES","reason":"Official and primary evidence documents recoater anomalies, collision damage, powder-spreading variability, and limitations of existing current-based protection."},"identifiable_partner_or_adopter":{"status":"YES","reason":"A powder-bed-fusion machine OEM such as EOS, an accredited additive-manufacturing laboratory, or an equipped machine operator can authorize telemetry access, temporary sensing, controlled challenges, and shadow evaluation."},"partner_access_is_necessary":{"status":"YES","reason":"The decisive uncertainties require synchronized proprietary machine commands and sensor streams, controlled physical disturbances, raw-signal retention, and machine-specific fallback testing that public research cannot supply."},"safe_authorized_first_step":{"status":"YES","reason":"The proposed first step is a bounded, raw-retaining shadow test on a non-production recoater or testbed, subject to OEM or laboratory authorization, with existing controls and independent safety interlocks remaining authoritative and no autonomous machine changes."},"bounded_decisive_empirical_design":{"status":"YES","reason":"The preregistered one-configuration trial compares residual reconstruction, full raw review, and static thresholds under nominal and blinded challenge passes, with explicit metrics and advancement-stopping criteria."},"no_material_negative_gate":{"status":"YES","reason":"All substantive pipeline gates are YES; cost scope is uncertain rather than negative and is not the sole rationale for partnering."},"not_merely_more_research":{"status":"YES","reason":"The next step specifies the partner, machine scope, frozen configuration, challenge set, comparators, measurements, and concrete falsification thresholds."}},"uncertainty_types":["PROBLEM_PREVALENCE","ADOPTER_PULL","INCREMENTAL_EFFECT","WORKFLOW_FIT","DATA_ACCESS","COST_SCOPE"],"partner_profile":"A powder-bed-fusion machine OEM, accredited additive-manufacturing laboratory, or industrial site operating an instrumentable recoater and able to authorize synchronized telemetry, temporary sensors, controlled challenge passes, raw-data retention, and blinded operator or engineering review.","required_access":"One bounded recoater or powder-spreading testbed; synchronized command, position, current or torque, force, vibration, acoustic, and layer-observation data; authority to introduce engineer-approved challenge conditions; complete raw-window retention; reviewer time; and permission to exercise checksum, heartbeat, timing, and full-signal fallback tests.","bounded_empirical_test":"Preregister a raw-retaining shadow study on one fixed recoater configuration, sensor layout, motion program, approved medium, and environmental envelope. Freeze the forward model, alignment, weights, thresholds, audit sampling, checksum, and fallback rules. Run nominal and blinded controlled challenges, then compare the residual path against complete raw-signal review and existing static thresholds on detection, localization, false alerts, reconstruction, fallback behavior, bytes, review time, inspections, and maintenance effort.","success_condition":"All protected, synchronization, heartbeat, and version-failure cases enter full-signal mode; no controlled external interaction is hidden by cancellation; event detection and localization meet the preregistered non-inferiority margin versus full raw review; reconstruction stays within tolerance; and total capacity burden including audits, fallbacks, inspections, and maintenance is lower than the full-signal baseline.","falsification_condition":"Any protected or synchronization challenge fails to force full mode, any controlled interaction is materially over-cancelled, detection or localization is inferior beyond the preregistered margin, reconstruction exceeds tolerance, or total capacity burden is not lower than the full-signal baseline.","rationale":"This is a genuine empirical-partner case: credible evidence supports the recoater-monitoring problem and adjacent technical feasibility, while the differentiated combined claim remains unresolved. Machine-specific data and controlled live access are indispensable to determine whether command-conditioned cancellation preserves consequential interactions and produces net operational benefit safely."}