{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp06_four_proposal_generalization60_20260803","cell_id":"predictive_residual_processing__environmental_climate","portfolio_valid":true,"proposal_assessments":[{"proposal_index":1,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally specifies the sensor target, matched versioned predictors, signed residual codec, precision gate, reconstruction, bounded updates, synchronization, heartbeats, drift and error budgets, independent raw audits, protected bypasses, and raw fallback. Its causal path is constrained-link savings and earlier detection of peatland departures."},{"proposal_index":2,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally specifies frozen climate-model expectations, provenance-bearing observations, hierarchical signed-error propagation, uncertainty-weighted review, reconstruction, versioning, independent full-field audits, governed model revision, and decompression. Its distinctive causal path uses unresolved residual structure across spatial and process layers to expose scientific model misspecification."},{"proposal_index":3,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally specifies a regulator-owned expected-dossier model, structured numerical and semantic residuals, consequence-weighted specialist routing, reconstructible context, cumulative-error and drift controls, approved baseline updates, immutable full records, independent section audits, protected disclosures, and complete-review fallback. Its causal path reallocates regulatory attention from repeated filing content to consequential documentary change."},{"proposal_index":4,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally specifies command and actuator provenance, a versioned forward response model, signed innovations, uncertainty-aware routing, reconstruction, offline bounded recalibration, raw audits, drift detection, protected signals, and full-signal fallback. Its distinctive efference-copy path cancels predicted self-caused river responses so coincident external disturbances remain salient."}],"pairwise_assessments":[{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":2,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 addresses energy and communications saturation in live peatland telemetry with a matched edge-server predictive codec; Proposal 2 addresses scarce scientific review attention with hierarchical propagation of climate-model residual structure toward model-revision decisions."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 compresses a continuous physical sensor stream for reconstructive transmission; Proposal 3 compares a legally complete filing against a regulator-governed expected dossier to route substantive documentary changes while retaining the full record."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 predicts passive peatland measurements to conserve a constrained link; Proposal 4 predicts the delayed consequences of deliberate reservoir commands and subtracts those self-generated effects to reveal unexplained river changes."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 uses a site-to-region-to-process hierarchy to diagnose structured discrepancies between climate simulations and observations; Proposal 3 uses field- and section-level expected-dossier deltas to govern regulatory evidence review and filing dispositions."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 is retrospective scientific evaluation driven by unresolved multiscale model-observation errors; Proposal 4 is command-conditioned operational monitoring driven by the unexplained remainder after predicted release effects are cancelled."},{"proposal_a":3,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 3 targets documentary repetition and cumulative disclosure changes through a regulator-owned semantic and numerical baseline; Proposal 4 targets physical masking by self-caused river responses through an efference-copy forward model tied to verified actuation."}],"replacement_indices":[],"rationale":"All four proposals instantiate the full governed prediction-residual-update architecture, including explicit expectations, actual observations, meaningful residuals, uncertainty and consequence weighting, constrained attention or bandwidth channels, reconstruction context, synchronization and provenance, independent raw-state checks, drift monitoring, protected bypasses, and decompression. They are mutually independent because they address different affected problems and use four materially different intervention paths: predictive telemetry coding, hierarchical scientific residual propagation, regulator-controlled dossier differencing, and command-conditioned efference-copy cancellation."}