{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp06_four_proposal_generalization60_20260803","source_assessment_id":"representation_independent_interface_contract__aviation_aeronautics:P3:v0","cell_id":"representation_independent_interface_contract__aviation_aeronautics","proposal_index":3,"qualification":"EMPIRICAL_PARTNER_CANDIDATE","criteria":{"specific_differentiated_claim":{"status":"YES","reason":"The residual claim is specific and falsifiable: a storage-opaque evidence-state contract and shared sequence oracle should preserve contract-level behavior across independent backends and detect five predefined defect classes better than schema, record-count, and sampled-report checks."},"credible_problem_signal":{"status":"YES","reason":"Regulatory guidance, industry surveys, and airline migration evidence credibly establish record-integrity, continuity, heterogeneous-system, synchronization, cleansing, and audit problems, while appropriately leaving the proposal's narrower hidden-dependency allegation for empirical testing."},"identifiable_partner_or_adopter":{"status":"YES","reason":"Aircraft operators, Part 121 certificate holders, continuing-airworthiness organizations, and MRO organizations are concrete partner classes able to sponsor the test and provide authorized maintenance-records reviewers."},"partner_access_is_necessary":{"status":"YES","reason":"The decisive uncertainties require proprietary dependency inventories, incumbent behavior, approved histories, organization-specific maintenance semantics, and authorized expert classification; ordinary public research cannot establish them."},"safe_authorized_first_step":{"status":"YES","reason":"The proposed first step is an approved, isolated, read-only shadow replay using synthetic or de-identified copied data, with no official-record writes, release-workflow connection, maintenance-credit decision, or operational-status change."},"bounded_decisive_empirical_design":{"status":"YES","reason":"The test is bounded to one obligation type, at least 100 curated histories plus generated sequences, two nominal implementations, five seeded mutants, explicit schema/count/sample-report comparators, leakage checks, acceptance thresholds, and predefined failure conditions."},"no_material_negative_gate":{"status":"YES","reason":"All substantive pipeline gates are YES, including problem, adopter, incremental claim, bounded test, and safety/authority. Cost scope is uncertain but not materially NO and can be refined as part of partner-specific test scoping."},"not_merely_more_research":{"status":"YES","reason":"The next step is a concrete partnered experiment with preregistered semantics, implementations, mutations, comparators, thresholds, replay procedures, and expert divergence adjudication—not an open-ended request for more research."}},"uncertainty_types":["PROBLEM_PREVALENCE","ADOPTER_PULL","INCREMENTAL_EFFECT","WORKFLOW_FIT","DATA_ACCESS","COST_SCOPE"],"partner_profile":"An aircraft operator, Part 121 certificate holder, continuing-airworthiness organization, or MRO with a legacy maintenance-records platform, authority to approve isolated data use, and access to maintenance-records or continuing-airworthiness reviewers qualified to define and adjudicate one obligation type.","required_access":"An approved dependency inventory; synthetic or de-identified bounded aircraft/configuration histories; a legally usable read-only incumbent interface; authoritative rules for units, applicability, cutoffs, corrections, conflicts, and evidence acceptance; an isolated test environment; and authorized expert review of every divergence.","bounded_empirical_test":"Pre-register one maintenance-obligation contract, baseline comparators, mutation set, thresholds, and authority boundaries. In an isolated environment, replay at least 100 curated edge-case histories plus generated sequences through an incumbent wrapper and an independently implemented immutable model. Compare revisions, statuses, provenance explanations, and errors; test representation-only perturbations; require rejection of mutants that double-count utilization, delete superseded evidence, depend on insertion order, double-install a component, or silently resolve conflicts; and audit outputs for representation leakage.","success_condition":"The two independently represented valid implementations agree on all preregistered contract-level outputs, the oracle rejects all five seeded defect classes, it provides discrimination beyond schema/count/sampled-report comparators, no forbidden representation leakage occurs, and authorized reviewers can classify every observed divergence without suppressing maintenance-relevant ambiguity.","falsification_condition":"The opportunity is falsified if scoped clients show no hidden representation dependencies or behavioral changes under representation-only perturbations, the baseline comparators catch the same defects, any seeded mutant escapes detection, known-valid implementations cannot agree without schema exposure, or the abstraction must collapse unresolved maintenance-relevant conflicts into definite status.","rationale":"This is a narrow empirical-partner candidate because substantial adjacent standards and products leave a plausible but unproven distinction: an executable representation-independent semantic substitution oracle. Public evidence establishes the problem context and credible adopters, but only authorized partner access can reveal actual hidden dependencies, validate one complete obligation contract, measure incremental defect detection, and determine workflow and integration feasibility."}