{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp06_four_proposal_generalization60_20260803","source_assessment_id":"representation_independent_interface_contract__aviation_aeronautics:P3:v0","cell_id":"representation_independent_interface_contract__aviation_aeronautics","proposal_index":3,"qualification":"EMPIRICAL_PARTNER_CANDIDATE","criteria":{"specific_differentiated_claim":{"status":"YES","reason":"Despite substantial adjacent standards, products, and migration practice, a specific residual claim remains: a storage-opaque evidence-state contract and shared generated-sequence oracle will distinguish semantic substitutability from schema compatibility and outperform schema, record-count, and sampled-report comparators on five predefined defect classes."},"credible_problem_signal":{"status":"YES","reason":"Regulatory guidance, industry surveys, and airline migration experience establish consequential record-integrity, continuity, heterogeneous-system, synchronization, cleansing, and audit problems. The exact prevalence of hidden storage dependencies is unverified, but the external signal is credible rather than speculative."},"identifiable_partner_or_adopter":{"status":"YES","reason":"A Part 121 aircraft operator, continuing-airworthiness organization, airline technical-operations group, or MRO undertaking maintenance-system migration is a concrete partner class able to sponsor the test; authorized maintenance-records and planning personnel can adjudicate semantics and discrepancies."},"partner_access_is_necessary":{"status":"YES","reason":"The decisive uncertainties concern proprietary client dependencies, incumbent behavior under representation-only perturbations, legally usable histories, maintenance-program semantics, and expert classification of divergences. These cannot be resolved through ordinary public research."},"safe_authorized_first_step":{"status":"YES","reason":"The proposed first step is an operator-approved, read-only shadow replay using synthetic or approved de-identified histories in an isolated environment. It excludes official-record writes, operational status changes, maintenance credit, deferrals, release decisions, and dispatch integration, with explicit halt and rollback conditions."},"bounded_decisive_empirical_design":{"status":"YES","reason":"The test is limited to one obligation type, at least 100 curated histories plus generated sequences, two nominal implementations, five seeded faulty implementations, predefined contract outputs, leakage probes, and schema/count/sample-report comparators. Its success and failure conditions directly adjudicate the residual claim."},"no_material_negative_gate":{"status":"YES","reason":"All substantive pipeline gates are YES, including problem support, adopter credibility, incremental claim, bounded evidence, and first-step safety. Cost is uncertain but does not constitute a material negative gate because the isolated experiment is scoped and the decisive uncertainties are empirical rather than cost-only."},"not_merely_more_research":{"status":"YES","reason":"The next action is a pre-registered partner experiment with specified access, implementations, histories, mutations, comparators, thresholds, outputs, and falsifiers—not an open-ended request for additional research."}},"uncertainty_types":["PROBLEM_PREVALENCE","ADOPTER_PULL","INCREMENTAL_EFFECT","WORKFLOW_FIT","DATA_ACCESS","COST_SCOPE"],"partner_profile":"A Part 121 operator, continuing-airworthiness organization, or MRO with a bounded maintenance-planning or records system, permission to run isolated shadow replays, and authorized maintenance-records or continuing-airworthiness reviewers who can define one obligation type and classify discrepancies without delegating maintenance or release authority to the software.","required_access":"Approved synthetic or de-identified configuration, installation, removal, utilization, accomplishment, correction, supersession, conflict, and out-of-order histories; a legally permitted test interface to incumbent logic and relevant scoped clients; a dependency inventory; an isolated execution environment; and authorized domain reviewers for contract elicitation and divergence adjudication.","bounded_empirical_test":"Pre-register one obligation contract, cutoff and conflict semantics, comparator behavior, acceptance thresholds, and authority boundaries. In isolation, replay at least 100 curated edge-case histories plus generated sequences through an incumbent wrapper and independently implemented immutable reference model. Apply representation-only perturbations, compare contract-level revisions, statuses, provenance explanations, and errors, run schema/count/sample-report baselines, test five seeded mutants covering duplicate utilization, supersession deletion, insertion-order dependence, double installation, and silent conflict resolution, and audit outputs for representation leakage.","success_condition":"The two independently represented nominal implementations agree on all pre-registered contract-level results for valid histories; every one of the five predefined seeded defect classes is rejected; the oracle detects relevant failures missed by at least one schema/count/sample-report comparator; no forbidden representation leakage occurs; and authorized reviewers can classify every observed divergence without suppressing maintenance-relevant ambiguity.","falsification_condition":"Disqualify the claim if representation-only perturbations never alter any scoped incumbent or client answer and no hidden dependency exists; if baseline checks catch the same predefined defects; if the oracle misses any seeded defect; if known-valid implementations cannot agree without exposing storage representation or sharing rule code; if contradictory evidence must be collapsed into a definite status; or if authorized reviewers determine that the abstraction omits indispensable maintenance context.","rationale":"This is a narrow empirical-partner case: close prior art prevents treating the broad functional surface as distinctive, but a falsifiable residual mechanism claim remains. External evidence establishes a consequential problem domain and credible adopter class, while the decisive evidence requires proprietary system access and authorized maintenance expertise. The isolated comparator-based replay is safe, finite, reversible, and capable of either validating the proposed semantic-substitution oracle or falsifying the underlying problem or intervention."}