{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp06_four_proposal_generalization60_20260803","cell_id":"representation_independent_interface_contract__criminology_forensic","portfolio_valid":true,"proposal_assessments":[{"proposal_index":1,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Complete and operational: it identifies concrete users, observable failures, an abstract evidence-continuity state machine, operations, invariants, hidden representations, a shared black-box oracle, substitution criteria, governance, safeguards, falsifiers, and a bounded test. Its causal path faithfully runs from reliance on storage-specific custody representations through behavioral contracting and conformance testing to meaning-preserving implementation substitution. Its affected object is physical-evidence continuity, distinct from the other three."},{"proposal_index":2,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Complete and operational: it specifies the artifact-corpus lifecycle, public retrieval and query operations, provenance and qualification laws, representation exclusions, acceptance tests, authority limits, falsifiers, and synthetic fixtures. It faithfully separates corpus meaning from parser or storage layout and gates substitutability on implementation-independent behavior. Its problem and intervention concern a sealed corpus derived from digital source material, not custody records, proficiency administration, or longitudinal research trajectories."},{"proposal_index":3,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Complete and operational: it defines roles, lifecycle transitions, visibility partitions, submission finality, error behavior, observable leakage channels, a shared conformance oracle, safeguards, falsifiers, and a sandbox evaluation. It faithfully addresses both hidden representation and accidental observable behavior so replacements preserve blindness and assessment state. Its intervention is a role-sensitive blind-exercise capsule, materially different from the record, corpus, and research components elsewhere in the portfolio."},{"proposal_index":4,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Complete and operational: it defines event assertions, corrections, observation intervals, as-of operations, policy versions, three-way observation results, invariants, representation hiding, conformance tests, privacy limits, falsifiers, and dual-representation fixtures. It faithfully converts representation-dependent rows and joins into an abstract behavioral trajectory whose implementations are judged by a common oracle. Its affected problem is longitudinal classification drift under data-store reimplementation, distinct from the three forensic operational components."}],"pairwise_assessments":[{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":2,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 preserves custody, seal, sampling, consumption, and correction history through a mutable evidence-continuity state machine; Proposal 2 preserves retrieval, provenance, qualification, relation, and query behavior through a sealed digital-artifact corpus. They affect different components and prevent different substitution failures."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 prevents evidentiary continuity meaning from changing with record-system representation; Proposal 3 prevents disclosure and lifecycle divergence in blind proficiency administration through role-partitioned views and submission-finality rules. Neither is a feature or population variant of the other."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 governs operational records for physical evidence; Proposal 4 governs pseudonymous research trajectories and the semantics of event equivalence, temporal knowledge, and inadequate observation. The former prevents custody-history distortion, while the latter prevents analytic classification drift."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 creates a sealed, queryable abstraction over extracted digital artifacts; Proposal 3 creates a role-sensitive workflow abstraction whose hidden classification must remain undisclosed. Corpus semantic divergence and proficiency-blindness leakage are different problems with different operations, invariants, and causal paths."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 addresses tool-specific extraction and artifact-store behavior for a fixed forensic image; Proposal 4 addresses row, join, correction, and coverage assumptions in longitudinal administrative research. One preserves artifact-corpus semantics, while the other preserves policy-relative trajectory and uncertainty semantics."},{"proposal_a":3,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 3 prevents exercise identification and invalid proficiency-state transitions through role-scoped lifecycle operations; Proposal 4 prevents research-result drift by abstracting justice events, as-of knowledge, corrections, and observation sufficiency. Their affected institutions, behaviors, and failure-to-outcome mechanisms are independent."}],"replacement_indices":[],"rationale":"All four proposals are operationally complete and preserve the archetype's essential causal structure: a precise observable behavioral surface, abstract state and invariants, hidden concrete representation, implementation-independent conformance oracle, leakage control, and an explicit substitutability rule. Although all appropriately instantiate the same archetype, they apply it to four independently adoptable components with different affected problems, domain interventions, and causal paths: physical-evidence continuity, digital-artifact corpus behavior, blind-proficiency administration, and longitudinal research trajectories. No proposal is merely a renamed variant, added feature, narrower population, or implementation detail of another."}