{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp06_four_proposal_generalization60_20260803","cell_id":"representation_independent_interface_contract__environmental_climate","portfolio_valid":true,"proposal_assessments":[{"proposal_index":1,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally complete: it defines actors, observable failure, an opaque stateful ledger, operations, invariants, errors, conformance gates, authority limits, falsifiers, and a bounded evidence step. It faithfully breaks coupling between scientific-record semantics and workbook/database/raster representations. Its evidence-lineage and aggregation problem is distinct from simulation, infrastructure, and policy-recommendation problems."},{"proposal_index":2,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally complete: it specifies abstract snow state, transition operations, conservation laws, numerical tolerances, checkpoint behavior, errors, shared tests, shadow evaluation, governance, and falsifiers. It faithfully replaces host dependence on layer and solver internals with a behavioral substitution contract. Its process-module intervention and flux/conservation causal path are distinct."},{"proposal_index":3,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally complete: it defines hydraulic ports, abstract operating state, admissible envelopes, sequence-aware commissioning, fault and maintenance semantics, separate white-box approvals, rollback conditions, and falsifiers. It faithfully separates externally promised service behavior from physical construction. Its physical-asset procurement and commissioning opportunity is distinct from all software or data components."},{"proposal_index":4,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally complete: it specifies a versioned recommendation state machine, typed evidence obligations, hysteresis and missingness laws, stable errors and receipts, independent reference testing, authority boundaries, and falsifiers. It faithfully prevents spreadsheet/dashboard representation from becoming policy semantics. Its advisory decision-engine problem and recommendation-transition path are distinct from evidence storage, process simulation, and infrastructure."}],"pairwise_assessments":[{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":2,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 protects observation lineage, quality decisions, and aggregates during evidence-backend replacement; proposal 2 encapsulates a dynamic snow solver and preserves physical state transitions, boundary fluxes, conservation, and checkpoints during numerical-module replacement."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 substitutes digital evidence stores through ledger operations and semantic replay; proposal 3 substitutes physical stormwater designs through hydraulic-port behavior, fault and maintenance modes, and commissioning, while retaining separate internal safety inspection."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Although both mention spreadsheets, proposal 1 governs the stored evidence itself—identity, revision, quality, provenance, and aggregation—whereas proposal 4 governs a policy state machine that converts already-defined evidence into stage recommendations using sufficiency, hysteresis, reasons, and receipts."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 addresses software-host reach-through into numerical layers and solvers using an opaque transition module and conservation oracle; proposal 3 addresses construction-prescriptive infrastructure procurement using a physical service boundary and sequence-aware commissioning."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 preserves thermodynamic simulation semantics across solver representations; proposal 4 preserves approved drought-policy recommendation transitions across calculator representations. Their affected clients, state, invariants, acceptance evidence, and failure consequences differ."},{"proposal_a":3,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 3 governs substitutability of constructed runoff-control assets at hydraulic and maintenance ports; proposal 4 governs substitutability of non-authoritative drought recommendation engines through policy-versioned assessment operations and receipts."}],"replacement_indices":[],"rationale":"All four proposals are operationally complete and preserve the archetype's full causal structure: accidental representation becomes an implicit interface; each intervention defines abstract state, public operations, behavioral laws, errors, hidden internals, a shared black-box oracle, substitution criteria, and version stewardship. The six comparisons show distinct affected problems, domain-specific interventions, and causal paths: evidence-record integrity, numerical process-module coupling, physical infrastructure substitution, and policy-recommendation reproducibility. Shared use of the mandated representation-independent contract is archetype fidelity, not duplication."}