{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp06_four_proposal_generalization60_20260803","source_assessment_id":"representation_independent_interface_contract__film_media_production:P2:v0","cell_id":"representation_independent_interface_contract__film_media_production","proposal_index":2,"qualification":"EMPIRICAL_PARTNER_CANDIDATE","criteria":{"specific_differentiated_claim":{"status":"YES","reason":"The proposal makes a falsifiable incremental claim that independent resolvers will preserve semantic membership, mappings, gaps, errors, and frozen-state behavior across specified representation-only transformations, unlike product-specific sync objects or schema-only baselines."},"credible_problem_signal":{"status":"YES","reason":"Official product documentation and standards show workflow-significant variation in synchronization evidence, offsets, gaps, roles, and channels, while MovieLabs identifies fragmented production representations and tool coupling as an interoperability burden."},"identifiable_partner_or_adopter":{"status":"YES","reason":"A post-production supervisor with production sound, camera/data, dailies, and editorial representatives is a concrete authorizing partner class; MovieLabs Greenlight is also a credible convenor for an interoperability demonstration."},"partner_access_is_necessary":{"status":"YES","reason":"The decisive uncertainties require authorized copied production media, incumbent dailies results, production-specific semantic judgments, and accountable operator assessment; public documentation cannot establish cross-implementation equivalence or diagnostic sufficiency."},"safe_authorized_first_step":{"status":"YES","reason":"The first step begins with written authorization and is confined to duplicated, non-live media in a read-only sandbox, preserves the incumbent workflow, forbids source writes and silent conflict resolution, and has explicit halt and rollback conditions."},"bounded_decisive_empirical_design":{"status":"YES","reason":"One short take, preregistered expected mappings and tolerance, independent manual-anchor and candidate implementations, incumbent and schema-only comparators, fixed transformations, and explicit falsifiers form a bounded and decision-relevant test."},"no_material_negative_gate":{"status":"YES","reason":"All substantive pipeline gates are YES. Cost scope is uncertain, but that uncertainty does not block the bounded first test and is not being used alone to justify qualification."},"not_merely_more_research":{"status":"YES","reason":"The next step is an executable partnered comparison with specified media, implementations, comparators, transformations, measurements, authorization requirements, and falsification conditions—not an open-ended request for more research."}},"uncertainty_types":["PROBLEM_PREVALENCE","ADOPTER_PULL","INCREMENTAL_EFFECT","WORKFLOW_FIT","DATA_ACCESS","COST_SCOPE"],"partner_profile":"A production or post-production organization represented by a post-production supervisor who can authorize duplicated-media testing, with production sound, camera/data-management, dailies, and assistant-editor representatives able to approve semantics and judge workflow adequacy; MovieLabs Greenlight is a plausible convenor.","required_access":"Written permission to use one duplicated, non-live multi-camera take with separate sound and a known gap or conflict; access to the incumbent dailies result and relevant metadata; and limited review by accountable sound, camera/data, dailies, and editorial personnel in a read-only sandbox.","bounded_empirical_test":"Preregister semantic membership, common-time mappings, explicit error states, positional tolerance, and a no-source-write rule. Run one harness against the incumbent result, an independent manual-anchor model, a candidate adapter, and where expressible a canonical-metadata or FCPXML-style baseline. Rename and relocate copied files, reorder registration, apply a compensated clock-origin shift, and losslessly segment a stream; compare mappings, gaps, conflict behavior, frozen-state behavior, operator diagnostic sufficiency, and implementation effort.","success_condition":"The manual-anchor model and adapter agree with approved semantic membership and mappings within the preregistered tolerance under every valid transformation, expose identical explicit gaps and conflicts, preserve state after rejection and freezing, never modify source media, and outperform the schema-only baseline in invariance or workflow adequacy without requiring prohibited private fields.","falsification_condition":"The claim fails if independent implementations diverge beyond tolerance after a valid transformation, silently resolve conflicts, mutate state after rejection or freezing, modify source artifacts, require routine inspection of vendor or algorithm internals for authorized work, or if the schema-only comparator achieves equivalent invariance and usability with materially less burden.","rationale":"Adjacent prior art establishes feasibility but does not resolve the proposal's distinctive cross-implementation behavioral-equivalence claim. The remaining evidence depends on proprietary production material, incumbent outputs, and judgments from accountable workflow roles, making a bounded authorized partner test both necessary and decisive."}