{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp06_four_proposal_generalization60_20260803","source_assessment_id":"representation_independent_interface_contract__film_media_production:P3:v0","cell_id":"representation_independent_interface_contract__film_media_production","proposal_index":3,"qualification":"EMPIRICAL_PARTNER_CANDIDATE","criteria":{"specific_differentiated_claim":{"status":"YES","reason":"The proposal makes a specific falsifiable claim that independently implemented adapters can preserve predeclared semantic and photographed cue trajectories, lifecycle and error behavior, enrolled-output confinement, and abort behavior despite address renumbering, registration reordering, and capability-equivalent fixture reallocation."},"credible_problem_signal":{"status":"YES","reason":"First-party console documentation reports differing playback, omitted effects or macros, incomplete fixture-profile translation, and required real-fixture correction; primary research also supports camera-specific physical divergence."},"identifiable_partner_or_adopter":{"status":"YES","reason":"A production lighting department or studio stage with a DP, gaffer, console programmer, electrical supervisor, and safety representative can authorize the trial and provide the required rig and workflow access; console vendors and interoperability stewards are also credible adopter classes."},"partner_access_is_necessary":{"status":"YES","reason":"Public research cannot determine whether an adapter preserves proprietary console behavior, photographed output, authority-approved tolerances, or workflow advantage; resolution requires console access, production experts, controlled fixtures, and approved measurement."},"safe_authorized_first_step":{"status":"YES","reason":"The first execution can be confined to a disconnected simulator after written creative and safety approval, with any physical repeat separately authorized in an isolated prelight bay without performers, production automation, machinery, pyrotechnics, or hazardous effects and with immediate de-energization rollback."},"bounded_decisive_empirical_design":{"status":"YES","reason":"One frozen cue program can compare a simple reference player, one adapter, and the incumbent import/manual-rebuild workflow under predeclared trajectory, timing, error, enrollment, and abort criteria plus three representation transformations; the outcomes directly support or falsify the incremental claim."},"no_material_negative_gate":{"status":"YES","reason":"All substantive pipeline gates are YES. Cost scope is uncertain but does not create a safety, authority, problem, adopter, distinctiveness, or test-design stop and is not the sole basis for qualification."},"not_merely_more_research":{"status":"YES","reason":"The next step specifies authorities, access, a fixed cue sequence, comparators, transformations, measurements, pass conditions, falsifiers, exclusions, and rollback rather than requesting open-ended investigation."}},"uncertainty_types":["PROBLEM_PREVALENCE","ADOPTER_PULL","INCREMENTAL_EFFECT","WORKFLOW_FIT","DATA_ACCESS","COST_SCOPE"],"partner_profile":"A film-production or studio-stage lighting team willing to provide a console simulator and isolated prelight bay, with a DP and gaffer empowered to approve visual tolerances, a console programmer able to implement the adapter, and electrical and safety authorities empowered to approve enrolled outputs and abort behavior.","required_access":"Written creative and electrical/safety authorization; access to one console implementation or simulator and its supported API or show-file interface; the incumbent import/manual-rebuild workflow; fixture descriptions; an isolated prelight bay for the conditional physical phase; approved camera, photometric, or spectral instrumentation; and accountable expert review of photographed behavior.","bounded_empirical_test":"Freeze one short program covering arm, rejection while unarmed, timed fade, two concurrent semantic endpoints, hold/resume, conflicting trigger, and abort-to-safe. Compare a simple reference player, one console adapter, and the incumbent import/manual-rebuild workflow first in a disconnected simulator, then only with separate authorization in an isolated prelight bay. Rerun after address renumbering, registration reordering, and one capability-equivalent fixture reallocation using tolerances fixed before implementation.","success_condition":"The adapter matches the frozen semantic and photographed trajectories, timing bounds, lifecycle transitions, and error behavior; rejected commands cause no output change; no command reaches an unenrolled endpoint; abort reaches the approved safe state by the deadline; invariance holds under all three representation transformations; and the approach provides measurable advantage over the incumbent workflow without raw-address escape hatches.","falsification_condition":"The claim fails if the incumbent workflow already satisfies the same criteria at equal or lower effort, representation changes produce no relevant divergence, the adapter requires console-native or raw-address dependencies, approved tolerances cannot express materially equivalent photographed behavior, two conforming implementations remain materially different to the accountable cinematography team, or physical fixture differences dominate the proposed abstraction.","rationale":"The opportunity retains a differentiated behavioral-contract claim beyond established transport and interchange standards, and external evidence supports both the interoperability problem and feasible enabling components. Its central uncertainties cannot be resolved through ordinary public research: they require proprietary implementation access, predeclared expert judgments, comparator execution, and controlled physical measurement. The proposed trial is narrow, reversible, authority-gated, and capable of falsifying both the abstraction and its claimed advantage, so it fits the empirical-partner lane despite unmeasured prevalence, absent adopter commitment, and low-confidence cost estimates."}