{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp06_four_proposal_generalization60_20260803","source_assessment_id":"representation_independent_interface_contract__film_media_production:P3:v0","cell_id":"representation_independent_interface_contract__film_media_production","proposal_index":3,"qualification":"EMPIRICAL_PARTNER_CANDIDATE","criteria":{"specific_differentiated_claim":{"status":"YES","reason":"The proposal makes a specific falsifiable claim that a semantic cue contract can preserve trajectories, lifecycle and error behavior, enrolled-output confinement, and abort behavior across independent implementations and representation changes, improving on transport, interchange, and manual-rebuild practices."},"credible_problem_signal":{"status":"YES","reason":"First-party console documentation reports differing playback, omitted effects or macros, incomplete fixture translation, and required physical verification; primary research also supports camera- and fixture-dependent output divergence."},"identifiable_partner_or_adopter":{"status":"YES","reason":"A production with a DP, gaffer, console programmer, stage electrical supervisor, and safety representative can authorize and operate the trial; console vendors, lighting manufacturers, and interoperability stewards are also identifiable implementation partners."},"partner_access_is_necessary":{"status":"YES","reason":"The remaining questions require console or simulator access, fixture and workflow knowledge, authority-approved tolerances, expert cinematography judgment, and eventually an isolated prelight bay; public research cannot establish behavioral or photographed equivalence."},"safe_authorized_first_step":{"status":"YES","reason":"The first step is explicitly authorization-gated and disconnected, with no performers, live production path, hazardous effects, machinery, or physical outputs; any isolated-bay repeat requires separate creative, electrical, and safety approval plus immediate de-energization rollback."},"bounded_decisive_empirical_design":{"status":"YES","reason":"One frozen cue program compares a reference player, a console adapter, and the incumbent import/manual-rebuild workflow under predeclared tolerances and three representation transformations, with explicit pass conditions and claim-level falsifiers."},"no_material_negative_gate":{"status":"YES","reason":"All substantive pipeline gates are YES, including problem support, adopter credibility, distinctness, bounded evidence, and safety/authority. Cost scope is uncertain but is not the sole rationale and does not block the bounded trial."},"not_merely_more_research":{"status":"YES","reason":"The next step specifies approvals, artifacts, implementations, comparators, transformations, measurements, stopping rules, success thresholds, and falsification outcomes rather than requesting undirected additional research."}},"uncertainty_types":["PROBLEM_PREVALENCE","ADOPTER_PULL","INCREMENTAL_EFFECT","WORKFLOW_FIT","DATA_ACCESS","COST_SCOPE"],"partner_profile":"A film or virtual-production stage willing to assign a DP or gaffer, lighting-console programmer, stage electrical supervisor, and safety representative, with access to a supported console simulator and—only after simulator success—an isolated non-hazardous prelight bay. A console vendor or lighting interoperability steward could serve as a complementary adapter partner.","required_access":"Written creative and electrical/safety approval; console simulator and API or adapter access; selected fixture descriptions and incumbent import/manual-rebuild workflow; authority-approved semantic, timing, photographic, and abort tolerances; and conditional access to an isolated prelight bay with approved camera or photometric instrumentation.","bounded_empirical_test":"Freeze one short program covering arming, timed fade, concurrent endpoints, hold/resume, conflict, rejection while unarmed, and abort-to-safe. Implement a simple reference player and one console adapter. Compare both with the incumbent import/manual-rebuild workflow in a disconnected simulator, then rerun after address renumbering, registration reordering, and capability-equivalent fixture reallocation. After simulator success and separate authorization, repeat the bounded measurements in an isolated prelight bay.","success_condition":"The adapter matches the reference program's frozen trajectories, lifecycle states, errors, and abort deadline within predeclared tolerances; rejected commands cause no output change; no unenrolled output is commanded; all representation transformations preserve results; and the approach detects or avoids meaningful divergences more reliably or efficiently than the incumbent workflow. Any physical repeat must also be judged photographically equivalent by the accountable cinematography team.","falsification_condition":"The claim fails if the incumbent workflow already meets all criteria at equal or lower effort, representation changes reveal no relevant coupling, the adapter requires raw-address or console-native escape hatches, output or lifecycle behavior exceeds frozen tolerances, abort or confinement fails, or conformance-passing implementations remain materially different to the accountable cinematography team because essential fixture-specific behavior cannot be abstracted.","rationale":"This is a narrow empirical-partner candidate: credible evidence establishes the interoperability problem and adjacent prior art, while a differentiated contract-level claim remains unresolved. The decisive uncertainties concern real console behavior, physical and photographed equivalence, workflow advantage, and authority acceptance, all of which require controlled partner access rather than further public web research. The proposed comparator-based trial is bounded, reversible, authorization-gated, and capable of falsifying the incremental claim."}