{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp06_four_proposal_generalization60_20260803","cell_id":"representation_independent_interface_contract__religious_studies_theology","portfolio_valid":true,"proposal_assessments":[{"proposal_index":1,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally specifies the affected archive, abstract record operations, hidden representations, invariants, conformance oracle, substitution gate, bounded baseline, pilot, authority limits, rollback, and falsifiers. Its causal path faithfully converts schema-dependent ritual evidence into representation-independent archival behavior and is distinct from calendaring, readiness assessment, and permission governance."},{"proposal_index":2,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Defines an authority-scoped calendrical resolver with explicit temporal inputs, ambiguity and error semantics, versioned states, hidden algorithms, black-box and metamorphic tests, a bounded pilot, governance, and falsifiers. It faithfully enables algorithm and rule-representation substitution and addresses prospective observance resolution rather than the other proposals' problems."},{"proposal_index":3,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Defines a scoped readiness attestation, observable assessment operations, state transitions, privacy and appeal invariants, hidden curricular representations, route-level conformance tests, an authorized synthetic pilot, rollback, and falsifiers. Its intervention makes assessment routes substitutable around demonstrated capabilities, a distinct educational decision problem and causal path."},{"proposal_index":4,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Defines an authority-scoped permission object with guarded operations, explicit states and errors, preserved history, minimum disclosure, hidden governance and storage representations, cross-implementation tests, opt-in authority controls, rollback, and falsifiers. It faithfully substitutes administrative representations without substituting community authority and is distinct from records, calendars, and readiness decisions."}],"pairwise_assessments":[{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":2,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 prevents repository representations from changing the meaning of archival ritual evidence through a source-grounded evidence-record contract; proposal 2 prevents calendrical engines and rule updates from silently changing authority-scoped observance results through a versioned resolver contract."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 governs preservation, querying, and export of ritual evidence across repository implementations; proposal 3 governs prerequisite-clearance decisions across transcript, portfolio, and challenge-assessment routes using a readiness attestation with appeal and expiry states."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 preserves scholarly assertions, provenance, category distinctions, and access constraints during archive substitution; proposal 4 preserves community-defined authorization, scope, revocation history, and disclosure limits during replacement of permission-record systems."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 contracts deterministic or explicitly underdetermined calendrical resolution under authority profiles and temporal conventions; proposal 3 contracts human assessment of bounded scholarly capabilities across educational pathways, including accommodation, privacy, and appeal behavior."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 substitutes calculation engines while preserving versioned observance results; proposal 4 substitutes administrative record implementations while preserving decisions that only designated community authorities may create, amend, suspend, or revoke."},{"proposal_a":3,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 3 replaces curricular proxies with capability-based readiness attestations produced by calibrated assessment routes; proposal 4 represents revocable community permission through authority-guarded state transitions and cannot be satisfied by demonstrating capability."}],"replacement_indices":[],"rationale":"All four proposals are operationally complete and preserve the archetype's full causal structure: a precise observable behavioral surface, hidden representation, invariants and state semantics, a shared black-box conformance oracle, and an explicit substitutability rule. Although they deliberately share that archetype, they apply it to four independent affected problems with different abstract objects, interventions, actors, decisions, and causal paths: archival evidence records, observance resolution, academic-readiness assessment, and community stewardship permission. No pair is merely a renamed variant, narrower population, added feature, or implementation detail of another."}