{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp06_four_proposal_generalization60_20260803","cell_id":"representation_independent_interface_contract__sociology_anthropology","portfolio_valid":true,"proposal_assessments":[{"proposal_index":1,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally specifies the permission object, operations, state transitions, invariants, hidden governance representation, authorized abstraction mappings, common black-box oracle, substitution gate, leakage controls, stewardship, falsifiers, rollback, and a bounded synthetic test. Its causal chain faithfully makes observable authorization behavior—not local deliberative records—the client contract."},{"proposal_index":2,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Fully defines an attributed-claim corpus with explicit missingness, contradiction, provenance, supersession, derivation laws, opaque backends, shared conformance tests, governance boundaries, falsifiers, and a dual-backend evidence step. It faithfully separates abstract ethnographic claim semantics from table or graph representation and addresses analytical continuity rather than access authorization."},{"proposal_index":3,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Provides a complete voluntary aid-commitment state machine, authority-scoped operations, idempotency and transition laws, privacy boundary, adapter mapping, reusable oracle, version governance, rollback, falsifiers, and synthetic tabletop. It faithfully permits internal organizing tools to change while preserving federation-visible coordination behavior and addresses live interorganizational handoffs rather than research records."},{"proposal_index":4,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Completely specifies abstract sampling units, snapshot and draw operations, uniqueness and determinism laws, hidden identifiers, representation mapping, black-box/property/metamorphic oracles, substantive version control, authority limits, falsifiers, and a synthetic dual-backend test. It faithfully protects sampling behavior from storage representation and addresses methodological selection integrity rather than permission, ethnographic interpretation, or aid coordination."}],"pairwise_assessments":[{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":2,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 prevents heterogeneous community-governance records from altering archive-use authorization through a permission state contract; Proposal 2 prevents corpus backends from altering attributed kin claims and derived analytical paths through a claim-corpus contract."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 governs normative authorization for use of archived materials, whereas Proposal 3 governs voluntary, time-bounded service commitments and message-transition behavior in cross-group aid routing."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 maps legitimate community decisions to enforceable archive permissions; Proposal 4 maps source records to unique sampling units and preserves eligibility, seeded draws, and inclusion probabilities."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 protects epistemic meaning, uncertainty, contradiction, and derivation across research-data representations; Proposal 3 protects operational responsibility and retry-safe status transitions across autonomous groups' coordination tools."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 exposes versioned attributed relation claims and rule-traced analytical paths; Proposal 4 exposes frozen sampling frames and reproducible probability draws, using uniqueness, eligibility, and permutation invariance as its decisive laws."},{"proposal_a":3,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 3 coordinates changing, authority-scoped aid commitments across organizational boundaries; Proposal 4 preserves the methodological population and selection behavior of research recruitment across computational backends."}],"replacement_indices":[],"rationale":"All four proposals are operationally complete and instantiate the archetype's full causal structure: a behavioral surface and abstract state, explicit laws and errors, hidden representation, an abstraction mapping, implementation-independent conformance oracle, substitution criteria, leakage controls, and governed evolution. Their shared contract architecture is required by the archetype, but their affected problems, abstract objects, interventions, decisive invariants, actors, consequences, and causal paths are materially different. Each can be adopted independently without implementing any other proposal."}