{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp06_four_proposal_generalization60_20260803","cell_id":"ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__criminology_forensic","portfolio_valid":true,"proposal_assessments":[{"proposal_index":1,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally complete and faithful: it converts abstract forensic-candor commitments into a governed recurring enactment with protected refusal, symbolic participation, concrete quality-action closure, memory, audit, repair, and retirement. Its affected problem, trace-to-person intervention, and candor-to-corrective-memory path are distinct from the other proposals."},{"proposal_index":2,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally complete and faithful: the empty-folder observance renews long-horizon duties toward unidentified decedents, transfers stewardship across custodial handoffs, closes into scheduled administrative review, and includes consent, debrief, audit, repair, and retirement. It is not merely a population-specific version of laboratory candor or records governance."},{"proposal_index":3,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally complete and faithful: a recurring synthetic boundary enactment makes cross-agency scene dependence embodied and contestable, renews handoff commitments, recognizes interface repairs, and assigns operational follow-through under robust consent and lifecycle governance. Its physical-boundary coordination problem and paced interagency intervention are materially distinct."},{"proposal_index":4,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally complete and faithful: fictional label propagation and witnessed retirement make ended operational authority socially legible while preserving lawful provenance and routing unresolved exceptions. Consent, plural participation, concrete closure, memory, skeptical review, repair, and retirement are fully specified, and the authority-sunset causal path is unique in the portfolio."}],"pairwise_assessments":[{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":2,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 addresses loss of epistemic candor inside forensic reporting through a trace-to-person card cycle and quality-action closure; Proposal 2 addresses loss of long-term stewardship for unidentified decedents through an empty-folder duty observance, witnessed succession, and due-case review."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 preserves analytical qualifications and corrective memory within a laboratory; Proposal 3 builds shared scene-boundary and transfer responsibility across agencies through fictional contamination reenactment, paced crossings, and interface repair."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 keeps limitations attached to forensic claims through candor renewal; Proposal 4 makes the expiration of a criminal-record label's operational authority recognizable through propagation reenactment, symbolic retirement, and downstream exception routing."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 sustains humane identification and custody duties over years and institutional handoffs; Proposal 3 coordinates simultaneous responders at physical scene boundaries through embodied crossings and transfers. Their stewardship continuity and interface-coordination paths are independently adoptable."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 renews obligations that must persist while identity remains unresolved; Proposal 4 enacts the opposite temporal problem—ending a label's operational authority while preserving lawful provenance—using witnessed retirement and exception routing rather than custodial renewal."},{"proposal_a":3,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 3 addresses physical scene entry, contamination responsibility, and real-time interagency handoffs through boundary movement; Proposal 4 addresses asynchronous digital and administrative label propagation through a system map, deconsecrating retirement act, and protected reconciliation workflow."}],"replacement_indices":[],"rationale":"All four proposals specify observable eligibility conditions, actors, consequences, bounded pilots, authority, safeguards, baselines, rivals, falsifiers, evidence steps, operational closure, and halt or retirement paths. Each preserves the archetype's defining governed cycle of recurring symbolic enactment, meaningful and nonretaliatory participation, commitment or recognition, material follow-through, memory, feedback, repair, and retirement. Although they necessarily share that archetypal lifecycle, none is merely renamed, narrowed, or feature-augmented: the four opportunities concern forensic-claim candor, unidentified-decedent stewardship, scene-boundary integrity, and criminal-record authority sunset, with distinct interventions and causal paths."}