{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp06_four_proposal_generalization60_20260803","source_assessment_id":"ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__environmental_climate:P1:v0","cell_id":"ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__environmental_climate","proposal_index":1,"qualification":"EMPIRICAL_PARTNER_CANDIDATE","criteria":{"specific_differentiated_claim":{"status":"YES","reason":"The proposal isolates a falsifiable incremental claim: adding a neutral threshold, voluntary card traversal, and witnessed renewal to an otherwise identical administrative readiness session will improve valid dependency discovery and/or delayed responsibility recall without increasing pressure, exclusion, or authority confusion."},"credible_problem_signal":{"status":"YES","reason":"Official climate-monitoring and field-season guidance establishes continuity, metadata, calibration, maintenance, controlled change, and preseason preparation as material operational needs. The exact prevalence of incomplete ownership and tacit-knowledge failures is uncertain, but the underlying problem and consequence have credible external support."},"identifiable_partner_or_adopter":{"status":"YES","reason":"Climate and ecosystem monitoring-network operators—such as NOAA-operated reference networks or NPS monitoring programs—are identifiable adopter classes whose program managers, station owners, data leads, and access reviewers can authorize and support a bounded study."},"partner_access_is_necessary":{"status":"YES","reason":"The remaining questions require actual monitoring personnel, partner-specific workflow knowledge, anonymous experience data, seven-day follow-up, and judgments about whether surfaced dependencies are operationally valid; ordinary public research cannot establish these facts."},"safe_authorized_first_step":{"status":"YES","reason":"A willing network can authorize a fictional-record tabletop that changes no real duties, retains formal authorization in ordinary systems, permits equivalent nonperformative participation, avoids identifiable refusal records, uses independent consent review, and includes binding halt criteria."},"bounded_decisive_empirical_design":{"status":"YES","reason":"The proposed preregistered crossover holds administrative content constant, uses four fictional records and 12–24 participants, measures blinded immediate and seven-day recall plus valid dependencies, and specifies quantitative failure and safety thresholds."},"no_material_negative_gate":{"status":"YES","reason":"The verified gates contain no material NO: the differentiated claim, authorizer class, bounded test, safety boundary, and cost scope are credible. Exact problem prevalence and adopter demand remain uncertainties to be tested rather than established practice, collision, or unresolved safety stops."},"not_merely_more_research":{"status":"YES","reason":"The next action is a specific partnered experiment with defined participants, comparator conditions, outcomes, thresholds, follow-up timing, and halt rules, rather than an open-ended request for additional research."}},"uncertainty_types":["PROBLEM_PREVALENCE","ADOPTER_PULL","INCREMENTAL_EFFECT","WORKFLOW_FIT","DATA_ACCESS","COST_SCOPE"],"partner_profile":"A multi-institution climate or ecosystem monitoring network approaching a seasonal transition, with a program manager able to authorize a fictional-record study; representatives from field operations, data and metadata custody, quality assurance, and land access; and an independent accessibility-and-consent reviewer.","required_access":"Authorization to recruit 12–24 monitoring personnel, construct four matched fictional station-to-archive records reflecting the partner's workflow, conduct anonymous safety and comprehension measures, obtain seven-day follow-up responses, and have qualified partner personnel validate whether surfaced dependencies are actionable. No real duty transfer or sensitive operational record is required for the first test.","bounded_empirical_test":"Run a preregistered 35-minute crossover comparison in which teams complete an administrative-only readiness mapping and the same session augmented with a neutral threshold, voluntary link-card traversal, and witnessed renewal, using different matched fictional records. Measure valid actionable dependencies, blinded immediate and seven-day recall of each link's primary, backup, and escalation route, opt-out and authority-boundary comprehension, felt pressure, accessibility, and reviewer-observed harms.","success_condition":"The ritualized condition surfaces at least one additional valid actionable dependency or improves seven-day complete-link recall by at least 15 percentage points relative to the administrative-only condition, while pressure and access ratings do not worsen by 0.5 or more on a five-point scale and no binding safety halt occurs.","falsification_condition":"Falsify incremental promise if the ritualized condition surfaces no additional valid dependency and improves seven-day complete-link recall by less than 15 percentage points, or if pressure or access ratings worsen by at least 0.5. Halt and reject progression for credible retaliation, compelled visibility, religious or cultural conflict, privacy breach, or confusion that enactment itself changes formal duties.","rationale":"Adjacent prior art covers preseason preparation, metadata controls, structured handoffs, and workplace rituals, but it does not resolve the proposal's narrow incremental comparison. Because the decisive uncertainties concern partner workflows, participant experience, delayed recall, and operational validity, a safe active-comparator study with an authorized monitoring-network partner is necessary and appropriately bounded."}