{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp06_four_proposal_generalization60_20260803","cell_id":"ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__human_computer_interaction","portfolio_valid":true,"proposal_assessments":[{"proposal_index":1,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally specifies actors, triggers, consent, marked sequence, role-specific renewal, practical release closure, memory, audit, repair, authority limits, falsifiers, and a bounded pilot. It faithfully converts decaying user-impact commitments into recurring symbolic stewardship with accountable follow-through."},{"proposal_index":2,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally defines household standing, change triggers, a sensing pause, spatial enactment, accessible turn-taking, conflict defaults, configuration closure, safeguards, falsifiers, and sandbox evidence. It faithfully uses governed recurring symbolism to renew multi-person ambient-system consent."},{"proposal_index":3,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally covers directives, authority, living-party consent, material provenance, platform-state marking, plural remembrance, stewardship renewal, authenticated closure, emotional safety, succession, audit, repair, retirement, and testing. It faithfully governs recurring symbolic memory enactment without claiming to create consent for the deceased."},{"proposal_index":4,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally maps capabilities and standing, marks observer-only time, reenacts agency transitions, circulates a nonfunctional symbol, renews delegation boundaries, and closes into enforceable permissions, gates, logs, owners, and remedies. It preserves consent, authority separation, audit, repair, retirement, falsifiers, and bounded testing."}],"pairwise_assessments":[{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":2,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 addresses decay of professional user-impact obligations across release cycles through a pre-release stewardship renewal; proposal 2 addresses stale and unequal household consent through a room-by-room sensing boundary walk that changes device and access controls."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 carries prospective product commitments into release decisions, whereas proposal 3 governs posthumous or incapacity-related digital remains through a memorial stewardship observance tied to access, retention, resurfacing, representation, and succession."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 renews obligations owed to users before software shipment; proposal 4 reenacts live transfers of agency in human–AI operations to expose divergent delegation models and translate them into permissions, approval gates, logs, and remedies."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 governs present multi-person sensing boundaries in shared physical space through spatial turn-taking and configuration changes; proposal 3 governs digital legacy, plural memory, and authorized succession through consented memorial encounter and authenticated legacy actions."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 resolves household standing and consent around ambient observation; proposal 4 resolves organizational ambiguity about AI proposal, execution, accountability, and correction through scenario reenactment and technical delegation controls."},{"proposal_a":3,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 3 addresses persistence and contested stewardship of a person's digital traces after death or incapacity; proposal 4 addresses changing operational agency boundaries between workers and an active AI system through recurring work-scenario enactment."}],"replacement_indices":[],"rationale":"All four proposals are operationally complete and preserve the archetype's governed cycle of explicit meaning, marked recurrence, legitimate and plural participation, symbolic enactment, practical closure, memory, reflective adaptation, repair, and retirement. Although they appropriately reuse archetypal mechanisms, their affected problems, concrete interventions, adoption settings, operational outputs, and causal paths are materially different across every pair."}