{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp06_four_proposal_generalization60_20260803","cell_id":"ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment__sociology_anthropology","portfolio_valid":true,"proposal_assessments":[{"proposal_index":1,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally specifies actors, authority, consent and exit, cadence, symbolic sequence, plural participation, witnessed recommitment, practical closure, memory, audit, repair, retirement, falsifiers, and a bounded evidence step. It faithfully converts dispersed reciprocal obligations into governed recurring enactment and then into verifiable conduct."},{"proposal_index":2,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally specifies safe evidence selection, roles, disclosure vetoes, marked reopening, plural participation, category decisions, artifact updates, debrief, audit, and rollback. It faithfully uses recurring symbolic enactment to interrupt reified classifications and renew their contestability, with closure altering codebooks, sampling, and claims."},{"proposal_index":3,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally specifies narrative standing, permissions, accessible equivalent routes, an incomplete-map frame, plural accounts, voluntary participation, archive tasks, actual custody handoff, harm review, withdrawal, and retirement. It faithfully makes fragmented place memory socially available through recurring, consent-governed enactment and practical stewardship."},{"proposal_index":4,"complete":true,"causally_faithful":true,"materially_distinct":true,"reason":"Operationally specifies mandate inventory, differentiated authority, reliance safeguards, voluntary labor, marked review, explicit disposition branches, operational transfers, public-status correction, role release, audit, rollback, and testing. It faithfully governs recurring renewal and legitimate ritual release while preventing ceremony from extinguishing surviving duties."}],"pairwise_assessments":[{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":2,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 addresses reciprocal obligations lost across research-partnership turnover through covenant re-consent and owned follow-through; Proposal 2 addresses reified analytic categories through witnessed confrontation with resistant evidence and revision of analytic artifacts."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 renews accountable institutional-community obligations; Proposal 3 transmits contested place-based memory through plural narration, mapping, archive work, and intergenerational custody transfer."},{"proposal_a":1,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 1 prevents valid reciprocal commitments from disappearing during turnover, whereas Proposal 4 prevents expired emergency mandates from persisting through ambiguous readiness, using disposition and release rather than covenant continuity."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":3,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 changes research categories by making counterevidence collectively consequential; Proposal 3 preserves plural community memory by situating authorized accounts in place and transferring archive stewardship."},{"proposal_a":2,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 2 interrupts epistemic closure in qualitative analysis and changes codebooks and claims; Proposal 4 resolves organizational afterlife by aligning mandates, capacity, custody, public signals, and voluntary service."},{"proposal_a":3,"proposal_b":4,"same_problem":false,"same_intervention":false,"independent_opportunity":true,"key_difference":"Proposal 3 counters memory erosion and narrative monopoly through plural remembrance and archival handoff; Proposal 4 counters hollow organizational continuity through mandate review, operational transfer, and deconsecrating release."}],"replacement_indices":[],"rationale":"All four proposals are operationally complete and preserve the archetype's defining causal cycle: explicit and contestable meaning, legitimate recurring symbolic enactment, plural and nonretaliatory participation, recognition or recommitment, practical consequences, memory, reflective review, repair, and retirement. Their affected problems, concrete interventions, and causal paths are materially distinct: reciprocal fieldwork obligations, analytic-category reification, displaced-community memory transmission, and post-emergency mandate persistence. All six pairs therefore constitute independently adoptable opportunities rather than renamed variants or population-specific repetitions."}