{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C002","selector_replication":3,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":82,"causal_archetype_fit":90,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":77,"operational_specificity":91,"falsifiability_test_quality":84,"adopter_partner_path":69,"deployability_complexity":51,"authority_safety_reversibility":94,"strict_potential":69,"empirical_partner_potential":75,"scrutiny_priority":73,"biggest_visible_risk":"The proposal assumes that strategic readiness declarations or premature pushback materially improve departure priority, but that premise may be false under the airport's actual sequencing and controller practices.","rationale":"The gate-held, capped-credit arena is unusually explicit about incentives, safety authority, reopening, and falsifiers. Its read-only replay is reversible, but mock credits may poorly represent live airline urgency, and implementation would require alignment among ATC, airport, and multiple airlines. Scrutiny is worthwhile if the hypothesized queue-position advantage is first confirmed."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":88,"causal_archetype_fit":92,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":70,"operational_specificity":94,"falsifiability_test_quality":91,"adopter_partner_path":81,"deployability_complexity":62,"authority_safety_reversibility":95,"strict_potential":80,"empirical_partner_potential":86,"scrutiny_priority":84,"biggest_visible_risk":"The extensive governance package may largely restate familiar open-interface, independent-conformance, escrow, and modular-procurement practices, leaving a narrow contrastive contribution after prior-art scrutiny.","rationale":"This proposal tightly connects the one-time gateway contest to durable control over interfaces and future entry. The isolated bench plugfest can directly expose undocumented dependencies and replacement failures without operational risk. Its breadth, contractual complexity, and dependence on multiple genuinely independent implementations reduce deployability, but a fleet owner could resolve the central uncertainty through a bounded study."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":90,"causal_archetype_fit":91,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":59,"operational_specificity":93,"falsifiability_test_quality":94,"adopter_partner_path":85,"deployability_complexity":72,"authority_safety_reversibility":96,"strict_potential":77,"empirical_partner_potential":89,"scrutiny_priority":83,"biggest_visible_risk":"Hidden tests, resource controls, safety gates, reproducibility audits, and staged hardware validation look close to standard robust benchmark and engineering downselect practice, making the remaining contrastive claim vulnerable.","rationale":"Benchmark overfitting under scarce integration capacity is consequential, and rivalry is causally central rather than decorative. The offline shadow contest is exceptionally bounded and can change a downselect decision by measuring rank stability across held-out seeds. However, hidden scenarios may reproduce simulator assumptions, and discretionary portfolio complementarity could weaken fairness."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":92,"causal_archetype_fit":93,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":68,"operational_specificity":95,"falsifiability_test_quality":91,"adopter_partner_path":93,"deployability_complexity":78,"authority_safety_reversibility":96,"strict_potential":84,"empirical_partner_potential":94,"scrutiny_priority":90,"biggest_visible_risk":"Shop-level reliability rankings may be dominated by case-mix, service-exposure, installation, and troubleshooting confounding, making repeat-removal attribution too unstable to govern work allocation.","rationale":"The proposal addresses a credible recurring procurement failure and makes delayed lifecycle consequences part of continuing rivalry through matched cohorts, score holdback, reserves, and portfolio allocation. An operator can test the decisive attribution question using existing records without changing maintenance or routing. The design is detailed, reversible, and has a clear path to a contractually authorized pilot, although performance-based maintenance and multisourcing practices create prior-art exposure."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_B","CANDIDATE_C","CANDIDATE_A"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_D","portfolio_observation":"All four proposals are unusually bounded and safety-conscious. D offers the strongest partner-resolvable decision with operational records; B and C are close, with B retaining a somewhat stronger contrastive governance claim and C offering the cleaner falsification study but greater prior-art vulnerability. A is the most institutionally difficult and depends on the least established problem premise in the supplied text.","confidence":"HIGH"}