{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C013","selector_replication":1,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":86,"causal_archetype_fit":88,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":45,"operational_specificity":94,"falsifiability_test_quality":94,"adopter_partner_path":89,"deployability_complexity":86,"authority_safety_reversibility":97,"strict_potential":72,"empirical_partner_potential":92,"scrutiny_priority":83,"biggest_visible_risk":"The capsule may be a highly governed version of familiar precedent libraries, accounting templates, and lease-workflow automation, leaving little contrastive claim after prior-art scrutiny.","rationale":"The proposal targets credible specialist congestion with a tightly bounded fact envelope, explicit controller authority, shadow-only holdout testing, and decisive disagreement criteria. It is unusually operational and reversible, but its core reuse mechanism looks close to standard precedent-based accounting practice; scrutiny should test whether the regeneration and selectivity regime adds a meaningful distinction."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":88,"causal_archetype_fit":92,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":72,"operational_specificity":91,"falsifiability_test_quality":92,"adopter_partner_path":84,"deployability_complexity":65,"authority_safety_reversibility":95,"strict_potential":82,"empirical_partner_potential":92,"scrutiny_priority":89,"biggest_visible_risk":"A contained rehearsal environment may not represent production operation closely enough, creating false readiness while also threatening the independence of later formal testing.","rationale":"The reusable proving cell is causally central rather than decorative: it creates the missing intermediate observation state while preserving formal assurance authority. The sealed retrospective comparison has strong kill criteria and can resolve the key uncertainty with a willing controls partner. Environment fidelity, operating-period constraints, and independence contamination make deployment harder but are explicitly testable."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":89,"causal_archetype_fit":91,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":60,"operational_specificity":90,"falsifiability_test_quality":88,"adopter_partner_path":72,"deployability_complexity":58,"authority_safety_reversibility":93,"strict_potential":77,"empirical_partner_potential":83,"scrutiny_priority":81,"biggest_visible_risk":"The intervention depends on durable supplier participation and authenticated cross-company relationships, so cooperative-case selection or shifted supplier labor could falsely appear to validate the broker.","rationale":"Repeated counterpart search, trust, identifier translation, and evidence exchange form a credible barrier for which a standing broker is causally well matched. The capped matched pilot is decision-relevant and preserves accounting and payment authority. However, bilateral consent, privacy, neutrality, and relationship maintenance complicate adoption, while centralized reconciliation services and supplier portals may leave limited contrast after scrutiny."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":93,"causal_archetype_fit":90,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":52,"operational_specificity":95,"falsifiability_test_quality":95,"adopter_partner_path":92,"deployability_complexity":83,"authority_safety_reversibility":97,"strict_potential":77,"empirical_partner_potential":94,"scrutiny_priority":91,"biggest_visible_risk":"The gateway may reduce to familiar validated ETL and audit-data-preparation automation, making its claimed closed regeneration cycle descriptively useful but not meaningfully contrastive.","rationale":"This is the clearest consequential bottleneck and the most executable partner study: archived populations, independent totals, shadow processing, reperformance, and explicit defect kill signals permit a strong bounded comparison. Authority and rollback are excellent, and stable source families make deployment plausible. Prior-art vulnerability is substantial, but the empirical value remains high because a partner can directly determine whether reusable profiles lower work without compromising population integrity."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_B","CANDIDATE_A","CANDIDATE_C"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_D","portfolio_observation":"All four proposals are unusually specific, safe, and testable; the principal discriminator is whether the reusable artifact creates a meaningful contrast beyond familiar controlled workflows. D has the strongest immediate partner experiment, B has the best balance of structural distinctiveness and empirical resolution, while A and C face respectively greater conventional-practice and cross-organizational-dependency risk.","confidence":"HIGH"}