{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C013","selector_replication":3,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":86,"causal_archetype_fit":88,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":68,"operational_specificity":91,"falsifiability_test_quality":87,"adopter_partner_path":77,"deployability_complexity":55,"authority_safety_reversibility":92,"strict_potential":79,"empirical_partner_potential":84,"scrutiny_priority":81,"biggest_visible_risk":"The intervention may reduce to a conventional managed supplier-reconciliation service whose apparent gains come from added labor, cooperative-case selection, or shifted supplier effort rather than reusable relationship capacity.","rationale":"The proposal targets a consequential, observable close and audit burden, and the standing broker is causally tied to the asserted cross-organizational activation barrier. Intake, exclusions, retained authorities, matched comparison, and reproducibility review are unusually concrete. Its vulnerability is that supplier reconciliation, outsourcing, portals, and relationship management are nearby practices, while deployment requires willing external counterparties and sensitive-document governance."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":78,"causal_archetype_fit":83,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":51,"operational_specificity":92,"falsifiability_test_quality":91,"adopter_partner_path":86,"deployability_complexity":78,"authority_safety_reversibility":96,"strict_potential":69,"empirical_partner_potential":78,"scrutiny_priority":70,"biggest_visible_risk":"A narrowly scoped precedent capsule may be indistinguishable from established accounting templates, decision trees, calculation workbooks, and controlled technical-accounting precedents.","rationale":"The problem and adopter are credible, and the frozen holdout test with blinded full reanalysis could decisively detect unsafe selectivity. The shadow-only first step is highly reversible and straightforward to authorize. However, the core intervention looks close to routine precedent management and workflow automation, leaving limited contrastive headroom even if the implementation is rigorous."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":84,"causal_archetype_fit":87,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":55,"operational_specificity":93,"falsifiability_test_quality":90,"adopter_partner_path":88,"deployability_complexity":74,"authority_safety_reversibility":95,"strict_potential":73,"empirical_partner_potential":83,"scrutiny_priority":75,"biggest_visible_risk":"The gateway may be standard audit-data ETL and source-profile automation with governance controls added, leaving little meaningful contrastive claim after prior-art scrutiny.","rationale":"Journal-population integrity is important, measurable, and well matched to a reusable transformation mechanism. The proposal supplies concrete invariants, rerouting rules, independent reperformance, resource accounting, and a safe retrospective shadow test using data a partner should possess. It ranks below the leading opportunities because canonicalization, reconciliation automation, and reusable source mappings are conspicuously known-looking, making distinctiveness the decisive uncertainty."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":89,"causal_archetype_fit":91,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":75,"operational_specificity":90,"falsifiability_test_quality":88,"adopter_partner_path":82,"deployability_complexity":51,"authority_safety_reversibility":93,"strict_potential":80,"empirical_partner_potential":91,"scrutiny_priority":86,"biggest_visible_risk":"A replay or nonproduction proving cell may not represent production operation, allowing rehearsed success to create false reassurance or contaminate tester independence.","rationale":"Late discovery of remediation defects is consequential, and the reusable segregated proving interface is causally central rather than decorative. The proposal sharply separates rehearsal from assurance, names authorities, preserves formal retesting, and offers a bounded outcome-sealed study whose missed historical failures can kill the concept. Environment fidelity, fixture cost, and independence make operational deployment difficult, but these are precisely the uncertainties an authorized partner can test."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_A","CANDIDATE_C","CANDIDATE_B"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_D","portfolio_observation":"All four proposals are unusually testable and well governed, but B and C are most exposed to collapsing into familiar template or ETL practice. D offers the strongest empirical-partner lane because a bounded retrospective replay can directly test predictive value, while A provides the best alternative centered on a cross-organizational coordination barrier.","confidence":"HIGH"}