{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C014","selector_replication":2,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":92,"causal_archetype_fit":90,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":54,"operational_specificity":95,"falsifiability_test_quality":96,"adopter_partner_path":91,"deployability_complexity":76,"authority_safety_reversibility":98,"strict_potential":76,"empirical_partner_potential":95,"scrutiny_priority":88,"biggest_visible_risk":"The governed conformity lane may reduce to familiar configuration-management workflow automation and preapproved exception handling, leaving little meaningful contrastive claim.","rationale":"The proposal targets a consequential, sharply observable post-maintenance delay and preserves engineering and return-to-service authority. Its capped shadow study can directly test barrier-attributable cycle time, specialist effort, downstream work, and false-ready outcomes under strong stop rules. It has an unusually clear partner path, although scrutiny may find that its central intervention is already standard-looking practice."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":82,"causal_archetype_fit":98,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":24,"operational_specificity":94,"falsifiability_test_quality":97,"adopter_partner_path":84,"deployability_complexity":58,"authority_safety_reversibility":97,"strict_potential":50,"empirical_partner_potential":87,"scrutiny_priority":69,"biggest_visible_risk":"A removable catalytic ozone-decomposition cartridge for aircraft environmental-control air looks highly vulnerable to direct prior-art overlap, while the active material itself remains unspecified.","rationale":"This is the most literal causal fit and supplies excellent inert, blank, repeated-cycle, selectivity, degradation, and regeneration tests. A laboratory partner could resolve technical performance safely. However, the apparent problem gap is not yet demonstrated, aircraft integration would be demanding, and the intervention resembles an established-looking application class, reducing strict opportunity."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":72,"causal_archetype_fit":92,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":16,"operational_specificity":96,"falsifiability_test_quality":96,"adopter_partner_path":89,"deployability_complexity":89,"authority_safety_reversibility":98,"strict_potential":39,"empirical_partner_potential":83,"scrutiny_priority":62,"biggest_visible_risk":"The cassette appears to be a reusable implementation of the familiar wind-tunnel transition-trip concept, so the remaining contrastive claim may be only packaging and maintenance discipline.","rationale":"The flow-state target, controls, diagnostics, side-effect checks, and regeneration assay are exceptionally concrete, and a bounded tunnel partner could test them cheaply and reversibly. Yet the problem is comparatively narrow and the core roughness-trigger mechanism looks strongly prior-art-vulnerable, making successful experimental performance insufficient by itself for a strong strict opportunity."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":89,"causal_archetype_fit":86,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":48,"operational_specificity":92,"falsifiability_test_quality":87,"adopter_partner_path":75,"deployability_complexity":52,"authority_safety_reversibility":96,"strict_potential":65,"empirical_partner_potential":79,"scrutiny_priority":78,"biggest_visible_risk":"A multi-party broker could become an additional safety-critical communications layer whose tabletop gains do not survive live stress, jurisdictional variation, or simultaneous events.","rationale":"The coordination barrier is consequential and the proposal carefully separates information assembly from pilot, air-traffic, airport, and emergency authority. Matched synthetic scenarios can falsify speed, accuracy, workload, saturation, and authority-comprehension claims safely. Its main weaknesses are a generic-looking broker pattern, substantial institutional adoption burden, and limited ability of tabletop evidence to settle operational effectiveness."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_A","CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_B","CANDIDATE_C"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_A","portfolio_observation":"All four proposals are unusually specific and reversible, but each has visible standard-practice vulnerability. Candidate A offers the best combination of consequential problem, authorized shadow deployment, decision-changing measurement, and realistic single-partner access. Candidate D is the stronger organizational alternate; Candidates B and C have cleaner physical assays but substantially greater direct prior-art vulnerability.","confidence":"HIGH"}