{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C015","selector_replication":1,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":84,"causal_archetype_fit":96,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":72,"operational_specificity":95,"falsifiability_test_quality":96,"adopter_partner_path":85,"deployability_complexity":77,"authority_safety_reversibility":95,"strict_potential":88,"empirical_partner_potential":91,"scrutiny_priority":90,"biggest_visible_risk":"Apparent regenerative activity may actually come from retained crystals after incomplete melting rather than from the insert's qualified surface.","rationale":"The proposal isolates a consequential nucleation barrier, makes the reusable interface causally essential, and supplies unusually strong no-insert, smooth-surface, phase-identity, leaching, and complete-melt controls. The bounded cell study can decisively distinguish selective reusable nucleation from residual seeding or consumable additives. Scale-dependent heat and mass transfer remain a later deployment challenge."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":89,"causal_archetype_fit":94,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":57,"operational_specificity":94,"falsifiability_test_quality":94,"adopter_partner_path":89,"deployability_complexity":71,"authority_safety_reversibility":93,"strict_potential":79,"empirical_partner_potential":93,"scrutiny_priority":85,"biggest_visible_risk":"Immobilization and fouling may eliminate the enzyme's rate advantage or cause rapid, unrecoverable activity loss after the first batch.","rationale":"The rate-limiting hypothesis, retained-enzyme mechanism, matched controls, leaching assays, and sequential reuse criteria form a credible and partner-ready test. The problem is important and the bench pathway is authorized and reversible. Its strict potential is reduced because an immobilized-enzyme reactor is highly vulnerable to known-looking prior art, leaving sustained performance on difficult textile fines as the main possible contrast."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":73,"causal_archetype_fit":71,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":43,"operational_specificity":92,"falsifiability_test_quality":88,"adopter_partner_path":86,"deployability_complexity":83,"authority_safety_reversibility":98,"strict_potential":59,"empirical_partner_potential":86,"scrutiny_priority":69,"biggest_visible_risk":"The lane may merely shift expert reconstruction into hidden steward and reviewer work while appearing to reduce visible handoffs.","rationale":"The shadow study is exceptionally safe, governed, and reversible, and it can test eligibility errors, criterion preservation, hidden labor, and reset burden. However, the intervention resembles conventional intake standardization, workflow automation, and fast-track review, while the catalytic archetype is less causally indispensable. Closed routine cases may also underrepresent live scientific ambiguity."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":75,"causal_archetype_fit":81,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":45,"operational_specificity":96,"falsifiability_test_quality":97,"adopter_partner_path":92,"deployability_complexity":87,"authority_safety_reversibility":98,"strict_potential":68,"empirical_partner_potential":94,"scrutiny_priority":78,"biggest_visible_risk":"Reference coupons may not represent sample-level instrument response, causing the transform to suppress genuine thin-film differences while producing false agreement.","rationale":"This is a highly specific, low-risk offline proposal with immutable raw data, a frozen transform, blinded holdouts, manual baselines, and decision-changing failure criteria. A willing laboratory could resolve the core uncertainty cleanly. Strict potential is limited by strong vulnerability to standard calibration, reference-material, and normalization practice, but the holdout design makes it an excellent empirical-partner candidate."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_A","CANDIDATE_B","CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_C"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_A","portfolio_observation":"A offers the strongest combination of archetype-essential causality, meaningful residual contrast, and decisive bounded testing. B is the strongest process-partner opportunity but appears more prior-art-vulnerable. D is exceptionally testable and safe despite a conventional-looking calibration core, while C is safest operationally but most resembles ordinary workflow redesign with a decorative catalytic framing.","confidence":"HIGH"}