{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C015","selector_replication":2,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":87,"causal_archetype_fit":96,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":76,"operational_specificity":96,"falsifiability_test_quality":97,"adopter_partner_path":88,"deployability_complexity":79,"authority_safety_reversibility":95,"strict_potential":91,"empirical_partner_potential":93,"scrutiny_priority":93,"biggest_visible_risk":"Residual crystals or surface alteration may masquerade as regenerable heterogeneous nucleation after nominal remelting.","rationale":"The recurring nucleation barrier is sharply distinguished from equilibrium, capacity, and heat-removal failures, making the reusable interface causally essential. Matched no-insert and smooth-insert controls, complete-melt verification, phase assays, and repeated cycles can decisively reject the mechanism. The bounded sealed-cell study is highly actionable, while the separately identifiable, nonstoichiometric, phase-selective insert leaves a meaningful contrastive claim for scrutiny."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":80,"causal_archetype_fit":76,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":43,"operational_specificity":95,"falsifiability_test_quality":93,"adopter_partner_path":94,"deployability_complexity":87,"authority_safety_reversibility":98,"strict_potential":68,"empirical_partner_potential":91,"scrutiny_priority":79,"biggest_visible_risk":"The gateway may create false cross-instrument agreement by correcting genuine specimen features or mounting effects as instrument response.","rationale":"The offline holdout design, immutable raw data, manual baseline, exception routing, and coupon-drift checks make this unusually safe and partner-ready. However, reference coupons plus a versioned calibration transform resemble ordinary governed metrology practice, and the regenerative-catalyst framing is less causally essential than the calibration function itself. Scrutiny could still establish a useful bounded implementation claim."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":75,"causal_archetype_fit":69,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":40,"operational_specificity":93,"falsifiability_test_quality":90,"adopter_partner_path":92,"deployability_complexity":82,"authority_safety_reversibility":98,"strict_potential":61,"empirical_partner_potential":88,"scrutiny_priority":72,"biggest_visible_risk":"Missing experiments, unresolved chemistry, or unavailable authority may dominate delay, leaving little recurring translation barrier for the lane to remove.","rationale":"The shadow study is reversible and can test eligibility errors, hidden labor, criterion preservation, and steward dependence on closed dossiers. Yet the intervention largely combines familiar intake templates, workflow automation, fast-track rules, and coordination roles; its regeneration language does limited causal work. It is a credible partner study but offers the weakest strict contrastive opportunity."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":90,"causal_archetype_fit":98,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":57,"operational_specificity":96,"falsifiability_test_quality":96,"adopter_partner_path":91,"deployability_complexity":72,"authority_safety_reversibility":93,"strict_potential":85,"empirical_partner_potential":95,"scrutiny_priority":90,"biggest_visible_risk":"Immobilization, textile-fines fouling, and inhibitor exposure may cause rapid activity loss or mass-transfer limitation, eliminating reusable turnover after the fresh-basket run.","rationale":"This is the most literal causal fit: retained enzyme must accelerate a feasible reaction, remain outside the output, regenerate, and repeat. Controls against bare support, no enzyme, and matched soluble enzyme are decision-relevant, and sequential reuse directly tests the claim. Its main deduction is prior-art vulnerability because immobilized-enzyme reactor designs look broadly familiar, though feed-specific selectivity, leaching, fouling, and downstream constraints still justify early scrutiny."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_A","CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_B","CANDIDATE_C"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_A","portfolio_observation":"A and D dominate because the regenerative facilitator is physically separable, mechanistically essential, and testable through repeated turnover with strong controls. A ranks first on the balance of strict distinctiveness and partner-testability; D has the strongest archetype fit and partner potential but greater vulnerability to known-looking immobilized-enzyme practice. B and C are safer and easier organizational studies, but their core interventions resemble standard calibration and workflow governance, weakening strict contrastive potential.","confidence":"HIGH"}