{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C015","selector_replication":3,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":78,"causal_archetype_fit":76,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":54,"operational_specificity":92,"falsifiability_test_quality":90,"adopter_partner_path":90,"deployability_complexity":84,"authority_safety_reversibility":95,"strict_potential":70,"empirical_partner_potential":89,"scrutiny_priority":79,"biggest_visible_risk":"The proposed facilitator may be an elaborate fast-track workflow for a burden caused mainly by missing scientific evidence or scarce reviewer capacity, leaving little contrastive claim beyond standard process improvement.","rationale":"The proposal sharply bounds eligibility, preserves functional authority, and offers an exceptionally safe shadow study with decision-relevant stop rules. Its observable workflow burden and willing-partner path are credible. However, evidence-translation lanes, templates, routing automation, and specialist coordination look textually vulnerable to extensive prior practice, while the catalytic archetype may be descriptive rather than causally indispensable."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":88,"causal_archetype_fit":94,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":60,"operational_specificity":94,"falsifiability_test_quality":95,"adopter_partner_path":88,"deployability_complexity":76,"authority_safety_reversibility":90,"strict_potential":84,"empirical_partner_potential":89,"scrutiny_priority":87,"biggest_visible_risk":"Immobilization and textile-fines mass-transfer or fouling effects may eliminate reusable catalytic benefit, making feed preparation or downstream purification the true bottleneck.","rationale":"This is a direct causal realization of a reusable catalyst: retained enzyme, bounded substrate interface, attributable controls, sequential turnover, regeneration, leaching assays, and retirement criteria. The matched bench probe can decisively distinguish catalysis from support, mixing, soluble-enzyme, and selection effects. Prior-art vulnerability is substantial because immobilized PET-active enzymes are an intuitively standard route, but the operational claim is concrete and partner-testable."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":91,"causal_archetype_fit":96,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":66,"operational_specificity":93,"falsifiability_test_quality":94,"adopter_partner_path":87,"deployability_complexity":80,"authority_safety_reversibility":92,"strict_potential":89,"empirical_partner_potential":88,"scrutiny_priority":90,"biggest_visible_risk":"Apparent multi-cycle performance may actually come from retained crystals or altered insert material rather than a completely reset, nonconsumptive nucleation surface.","rationale":"The metastable liquid, nucleation barrier, phase-selective interface, complete-melt reset, and repeated-cycle assay form the cleanest causal archetype in the set. Smooth, absent, and authorized-rival controls make the decisive claim falsifiable, while sealed low-volume testing is bounded and reversible. Surface nucleation is prior-art vulnerable, but verified regeneration, phase selectivity, and exclusion of residual seeding preserve a meaningful contrastive claim for scrutiny."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":79,"causal_archetype_fit":80,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":51,"operational_specificity":94,"falsifiability_test_quality":94,"adopter_partner_path":94,"deployability_complexity":88,"authority_safety_reversibility":97,"strict_potential":72,"empirical_partner_potential":93,"scrutiny_priority":83,"biggest_visible_risk":"Reference-based cross-instrument calibration may be standard metrology, and coupon residuals may not separate instrument response from mounting or specimen-specific effects.","rationale":"The offline blinded-holdout study is unusually deployable, safe, and capable of changing an adoption decision; immutable raw data and explicit false-agreement tests strengthen it further. A laboratory partner could resolve the central empirical uncertainty cheaply. Nonetheless, reference coupons, frozen transforms, validation gates, and drift monitoring appear highly exposed to prior practice, and the regenerative-catalyst framing is less causally essential than in the physical interventions."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_C","CANDIDATE_B","CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_A"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_C","portfolio_observation":"C and B offer the strongest strict opportunities because the archetype is physically causal and their bounded controls directly assay turnover and regeneration. D is the best empirical-partner opportunity but faces the greatest risk of collapsing into established calibration practice; A also has an excellent partner study yet a weaker, more workflow-like contrastive claim.","confidence":"HIGH"}