{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C016","selector_replication":1,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":90,"causal_archetype_fit":88,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":67,"operational_specificity":95,"falsifiability_test_quality":94,"adopter_partner_path":89,"deployability_complexity":72,"authority_safety_reversibility":97,"strict_potential":86,"empirical_partner_potential":88,"scrutiny_priority":86,"biggest_visible_risk":"The lane may be a sophisticated form of conventional evidence-management workflow automation, leaving little contrastive claim after prior-art scrutiny.","rationale":"The proposal isolates repeated clearance-dossier reconstruction from substantive retention barriers, specifies authoritative inputs and fail-closed routing, and offers an unusually safe shadow test with decision-relevant error and workload measures. Its strongest qualities are operational precision, retained custodian authority, and reversibility. However, multi-office legal variation, stale records, and the known-looking combination of rules, checklists, and workflow automation threaten both deployability and distinctiveness."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":78,"causal_archetype_fit":82,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":62,"operational_specificity":92,"falsifiability_test_quality":93,"adopter_partner_path":86,"deployability_complexity":78,"authority_safety_reversibility":94,"strict_potential":79,"empirical_partner_potential":84,"scrutiny_priority":78,"biggest_visible_risk":"The reference gateway may collapse into standard validated forensic tooling while inheriting unresolved scientific-validity and reference-representativeness problems.","rationale":"The operating envelope, examiner authority, reset cycle, blind probe, and explicit false-inclusion and false-exclusion measures are strong. A laboratory could resolve the preparation-time and classification questions through a bounded study. Yet the claimed recurring barrier may be inseparable from case-specific expert interpretation, and reference libraries plus automated feature comparison look especially vulnerable to existing-practice overlap and systematic anchoring."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":92,"causal_archetype_fit":86,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":70,"operational_specificity":91,"falsifiability_test_quality":93,"adopter_partner_path":88,"deployability_complexity":67,"authority_safety_reversibility":93,"strict_potential":75,"empirical_partner_potential":89,"scrutiny_priority":82,"biggest_visible_risk":"Remote guidance may omit scene information that can only be perceived physically, making the proposed eligible lane narrower or less safe than assumed.","rationale":"The transient-evidence problem is consequential, the specialist-access mechanism is causally direct, and the simulation can test plan quality, escalation, fatigue, and downstream burden without live evidence. The proposal also preserves local command and creates clear refusal routes. Strict potential is limited by dependence on high-quality remote perception, scarce human specialists, and the possibility that most altered-remains scenes require physical attendance; those uncertainties make it particularly suitable for partner validation."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":91,"causal_archetype_fit":93,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":78,"operational_specificity":90,"falsifiability_test_quality":92,"adopter_partner_path":93,"deployability_complexity":74,"authority_safety_reversibility":95,"strict_potential":82,"empirical_partner_potential":91,"scrutiny_priority":88,"biggest_visible_risk":"The broker may merely relocate coordination work while becoming a privacy-sensitive gatekeeper whose apparent gains depend on downstream laboratories absorbing more referrals.","rationale":"The standing broker is tightly matched to the stated recurring barrier: reusable trust, contact, authorization, translation, and submission infrastructure across jurisdictions. Authority remains distributed, minimum-data handling is explicit, and the crossover tabletop can reveal misrouting, disclosure errors, packet rejection, workload transfer, and capacity restoration. The principal uncertainties—whether coordination is truly rate-limiting and whether institutional capital can be maintained without gatekeeping—are both consequential and partner-testable."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_A","CANDIDATE_C","CANDIDATE_B"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_D","portfolio_observation":"All four proposals are unusually bounded, reversible, and testable; differentiation therefore turns mainly on whether the reusable facilitator is causally indispensable and whether a meaningful claim survives resemblance to ordinary workflow automation or specialist service delivery. D offers the clearest reusable cross-institutional mechanism and strongest partner path, A offers the strongest fail-closed operational design, C is a high-value empirical question with material remote-perception risk, and B is most exposed to standard-tooling and scientific-validity overlap.","confidence":"MODERATE"}