{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C016","selector_replication":3,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":85,"causal_archetype_fit":92,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":64,"operational_specificity":95,"falsifiability_test_quality":95,"adopter_partner_path":91,"deployability_complexity":78,"authority_safety_reversibility":95,"strict_potential":85,"empirical_partner_potential":93,"scrutiny_priority":87,"biggest_visible_risk":"The asserted bottleneck may chiefly be legal access, case-specific interpretation, or downstream review rather than repeated reference and extraction setup, leaving a well-specified gateway that does not relieve the rate-limiting barrier.","rationale":"The proposal tightly bounds supported files and conclusions, preserves examiner authority, specifies reset and exception handling, and offers a strong randomized shadow test with decision-relevant error and workload measures. Its main scrutiny vulnerability is that a reference library, validated workflow, and reporting template can look like ordinary laboratory standardization or automation unless repeated turnover and verified regeneration produce a meaningful contrast."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":89,"causal_archetype_fit":87,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":73,"operational_specificity":92,"falsifiability_test_quality":95,"adopter_partner_path":84,"deployability_complexity":68,"authority_safety_reversibility":94,"strict_potential":82,"empirical_partner_potential":95,"scrutiny_priority":88,"biggest_visible_risk":"Remote media may omit spatial, sensory, or environmental information essential to preservation decisions, making the lane an unsafe substitute precisely when transient evidence makes errors irreversible.","rationale":"The specialist lane addresses a consequential, time-sensitive interpretation barrier and makes the reusable human facilitator, eligibility rules, escalation, fatigue management, and local authority explicit. Its simulation-first crossover study is unusually capable of resolving the decisive uncertainty without live-scene exposure. Strict survival depends on showing that a substantial bounded class can be handled remotely without simply adding specialist labor or displacing required physical examination."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":92,"causal_archetype_fit":95,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":80,"operational_specificity":91,"falsifiability_test_quality":92,"adopter_partner_path":73,"deployability_complexity":61,"authority_safety_reversibility":92,"strict_potential":88,"empirical_partner_potential":89,"scrutiny_priority":90,"biggest_visible_risk":"The multi-jurisdiction authority, privacy, and governance dependencies may prevent the broker from maintaining a stable reusable pathway, causing each referral to remain bespoke coordination.","rationale":"This is the strongest causal use of the archetype: maintained relationships, authorization maps, translation knowledge, and submission contracts directly lower a recurring activation barrier while existing custodians, laboratories, and identification authorities retain control. The accepted-packet endpoint, ordinary-pathway comparator, reroutes, privacy measures, and tabletop falsifier are concrete. Scrutiny should focus on whether the broker truly reuses institutional capital rather than becoming another coordinator, gatekeeper, or workload-shifting layer."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":93,"causal_archetype_fit":91,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":60,"operational_specificity":96,"falsifiability_test_quality":96,"adopter_partner_path":89,"deployability_complexity":72,"authority_safety_reversibility":96,"strict_potential":81,"empirical_partner_potential":94,"scrutiny_priority":86,"biggest_visible_risk":"Even a rare false clearance can enable irreversible evidence loss, and throughput incentives may gradually turn missing, stale, or conflicting information into inferred permission despite the stated safeguards.","rationale":"The proposal targets an important and observable verification burden, sharply separates certification from physical disposition, defaults uncertainty to blocking, and offers an excellent shadow study using synthetic and previously resolved records. It has a credible empirical-partner lane and unusually strong rollback protections. Its strict opportunity is weakened because the core source-query, rules-engine, and dossier workflow looks readily reducible to conventional records automation, while safe operational deployment demands near-zero tolerance for false clearance."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_C","CANDIDATE_B","CANDIDATE_A","CANDIDATE_D"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_C","portfolio_observation":"All four proposals are unusually bounded and testable, so the main separation is not completeness but contrastive durability. C makes reusable institutional relationships most causally essential; B offers the most decisive partner-resolvable uncertainty; A and D have excellent probes and controls but are more vulnerable to collapsing into ordinary workflow automation or standardization under scrutiny.","confidence":"MODERATE"}