{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C018","selector_replication":1,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":76,"causal_archetype_fit":81,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":45,"operational_specificity":83,"falsifiability_test_quality":78,"adopter_partner_path":65,"deployability_complexity":56,"authority_safety_reversibility":91,"strict_potential":60,"empirical_partner_potential":73,"scrutiny_priority":66,"biggest_visible_risk":"The relay closely resembles ordinary film-office, location-broker, and relationship-management functions, leaving a vulnerable contrastive claim once existing referral networks and case-specific labor are accounted for.","rationale":"The consent-delay problem is credible, and the proposal sharply limits authority, eligibility, confidentiality, and rollback. Its six-case probe can reveal whether trust and translation are actually limiting. However, results will be difficult to attribute across heterogeneous properties, and maintaining relationships, profiles, specialist interpretation, and neutrality may still require effort roughly proportional to cases."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":82,"causal_archetype_fit":84,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":58,"operational_specificity":90,"falsifiability_test_quality":88,"adopter_partner_path":86,"deployability_complexity":80,"authority_safety_reversibility":93,"strict_potential":76,"empirical_partner_potential":89,"scrutiny_priority":81,"biggest_visible_risk":"The dock may formalize familiar continuity photographs, reset checklists, prop trays, and assistant-director coordination without producing savings beyond crew learning and stable-scene repetition.","rationale":"Repeated scene-state disturbance is concrete and consequential, and the reusable manifest, department interfaces, exception lane, and regeneration cycle make the archetype causally relevant. The reversible single-setup probe has measurable state quality and timing outcomes. Its main weakness is a known-looking operational bundle and substantial confounding from learning, while applicability is restricted to stable, routine setups."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":80,"causal_archetype_fit":82,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":43,"operational_specificity":94,"falsifiability_test_quality":92,"adopter_partner_path":91,"deployability_complexity":88,"authority_safety_reversibility":96,"strict_potential":69,"empirical_partner_potential":93,"scrutiny_priority":79,"biggest_visible_risk":"The gateway appears highly vulnerable to being standard pipeline automation—schemas, templates, packaging scripts, validators, and exception handling—rather than a meaningfully distinct intervention.","rationale":"This is the cleanest deployable shadow study: inputs, acceptance rules, security boundaries, comparator, error modes, and stop conditions are unusually explicit. A post-production partner could resolve the decisive efficiency and selectivity questions quickly. Scrutiny priority is moderated because the proposed mechanism is conventional-looking automation and may merely encode existing vendor-specific turnover practice or shift work into metadata cleanup and adapter maintenance."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":86,"causal_archetype_fit":92,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":61,"operational_specificity":95,"falsifiability_test_quality":94,"adopter_partner_path":89,"deployability_complexity":77,"authority_safety_reversibility":95,"strict_potential":84,"empirical_partner_potential":94,"scrutiny_priority":90,"biggest_visible_risk":"A fixed calibration gate may be an expected calibration-station workflow, and its apparent leverage may disappear after target verification, equipment handling, specialist review, and configuration heterogeneity are fully counted.","rationale":"The proposal has the strongest causal fit: a stable measurement interface repeatedly transforms supported configurations, independently validates outputs, checks its own reference integrity, and explicitly regenerates between cycles. The non-shooting probe is bounded, reversible, quantitatively decisive, and includes withheld validation plus a repeated configuration to test recovery. Prior-art vulnerability remains meaningful, but the measurable technical contrast and credible stage partner path justify first scrutiny."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_B","CANDIDATE_C","CANDIDATE_A"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_D","portfolio_observation":"All four proposals describe real workflow friction and unusually careful safe-to-fail tests, but each packages recognizable coordination or automation practices. D offers the best combination of archetype-essential regeneration, objective validation, and partner-resolvable uncertainty. B slightly outranks C despite C's superior shadow-test practicality because B retains a less purely conventional automation claim; C remains a strong empirical-partner candidate. A has the greatest attribution, governance, and proportional-labor burden.","confidence":"HIGH"}