{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C018","selector_replication":2,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":89,"causal_archetype_fit":92,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":64,"operational_specificity":95,"falsifiability_test_quality":91,"adopter_partner_path":94,"deployability_complexity":86,"authority_safety_reversibility":97,"strict_potential":87,"empirical_partner_potential":95,"scrutiny_priority":93,"biggest_visible_risk":"The dock may formalize familiar continuity and department-reset practices without producing a contrastive effect beyond crew learning, better preparation, or a shared checklist.","rationale":"The proposal isolates a consequential recurring coordination barrier, sharply bounds eligible setups, preserves departmental and safety authority, and offers an unusually executable six-cycle probe with independent continuity scoring. Preparation, regeneration, false-ready signals, learning effects, and non-coordination bottlenecks are explicitly measured. Its chief scrutiny vulnerability is whether the integrated dock is materially distinct from established continuity documentation, reset carts, marks, and assistant-director coordination."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":91,"causal_archetype_fit":95,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":55,"operational_specificity":96,"falsifiability_test_quality":96,"adopter_partner_path":90,"deployability_complexity":78,"authority_safety_reversibility":96,"strict_potential":84,"empirical_partner_potential":94,"scrutiny_priority":91,"biggest_visible_risk":"A fixed target, automated profile generation, configuration manifests, and withheld calibration checks look close to ordinary governed calibration-system practice.","rationale":"This has the cleanest technical transformation, strongest selectivity boundary, and most decisive measurements: residual error, withheld poses, repeat configurations, reference drift, technician effort, and false passes. The non-shooting isolated-profile probe is highly reversible and partner-resolvable. It ranks just below A because prior-art vulnerability is visibly high and deployment depends on precise stage geometry, supported equipment envelopes, software integration, and specialist stewardship."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":84,"causal_archetype_fit":89,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":38,"operational_specificity":94,"falsifiability_test_quality":94,"adopter_partner_path":95,"deployability_complexity":90,"authority_safety_reversibility":98,"strict_potential":66,"empirical_partner_potential":91,"scrutiny_priority":80,"biggest_visible_risk":"The proposed gateway closely resembles standard media-pipeline automation built from manifests, templates, validators, packaging scripts, checksums, and exception handling.","rationale":"The proposal is exceptionally safe and easy to test in shadow mode, with clear acceptance criteria and a realistic production partner path. The problem and intervention are credible, but the causal mechanism is conventional workflow automation and technical validation. Consequently, a partner could readily quantify value, yet expensive scrutiny is comparatively likely to collapse the remaining contrastive claim into known-looking pipeline engineering."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":82,"causal_archetype_fit":86,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":65,"operational_specificity":89,"falsifiability_test_quality":85,"adopter_partner_path":79,"deployability_complexity":58,"authority_safety_reversibility":92,"strict_potential":73,"empirical_partner_potential":86,"scrutiny_priority":84,"biggest_visible_risk":"Human brokerage, trust maintenance, and case-specific translation may scale nearly one-for-one with requests, making the relay added service capacity rather than a reusable barrier-lowering facilitator.","rationale":"The proposal treats consent, confidentiality, conflicts, refusal, and downstream permit capacity seriously, and its opt-in pilot can test an important structural uncertainty. It is more contrastively interesting than routine packaging automation, but multi-party recruitment, heterogeneous properties, selection effects, small sample size, and relational carryover make attribution difficult. Existing film-office, broker, directory, and personal-network functions also create substantial text-visible prior-art vulnerability."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_A","CANDIDATE_B","CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_C"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_A","portfolio_observation":"All four proposals are unusually bounded, reversible, and falsifiable; differentiation therefore turns mainly on prior-art vulnerability and whether the reusable facilitator truly lowers a recurring barrier instead of repackaging standard coordination or adding specialist capacity. A and B offer the strongest combined strict and partner lanes, D is an informative but operationally difficult relational experiment, and C is highly testable but most visibly conventional.","confidence":"MODERATE"}