{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C018","selector_replication":3,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":88,"causal_archetype_fit":86,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":69,"operational_specificity":91,"falsifiability_test_quality":89,"adopter_partner_path":87,"deployability_complexity":76,"authority_safety_reversibility":93,"strict_potential":82,"empirical_partner_potential":90,"scrutiny_priority":86,"biggest_visible_risk":"The dock may formalize familiar continuity and department-reset practices while adding preparation and steward workload that outweighs savings.","rationale":"The proposal targets a consequential, observable coordination bottleneck and makes repeated reuse, selective admission, regeneration, and authority boundaries causally central. Its six-cycle reversible probe includes a credible baseline, full-cost accounting, independent continuity scoring, and decision-changing falsifiers. It is more operationally complex than the other workflow proposals, but a production can authorize the bounded test without placing safety-critical work or creative authority under the dock."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":82,"causal_archetype_fit":75,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":45,"operational_specificity":83,"falsifiability_test_quality":80,"adopter_partner_path":76,"deployability_complexity":57,"authority_safety_reversibility":88,"strict_potential":59,"empirical_partner_potential":76,"scrutiny_priority":67,"biggest_visible_risk":"The relay closely resembles ordinary film-office, broker, directory, and location-manager functions, while relationship work may continue to scale nearly one-for-one with requests.","rationale":"The access and translation problem is plausible and important, and the proposal carefully preserves owner consent and public authority. However, the intervention depends on multi-party recruitment, confidential profiles, neutrality, and relational maintenance before it can be tested cleanly. Its strongest uncertainty is partner-resolvable, but scarcity, owner willingness, compensation, and permit capacity may dominate, leaving a conventional intermediary rather than a distinctive reusable mechanism."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":87,"causal_archetype_fit":92,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":43,"operational_specificity":94,"falsifiability_test_quality":93,"adopter_partner_path":86,"deployability_complexity":74,"authority_safety_reversibility":94,"strict_potential":69,"empirical_partner_potential":89,"scrutiny_priority":79,"biggest_visible_risk":"A fixed calibration station, automated profile generation, and withheld validation look strongly like standard calibration engineering practice, limiting the remaining contrastive claim.","rationale":"This is the cleanest mechanistic mapping: a stable reusable gate transforms supported configurations, tests selectivity independently, and regenerates against a known reference. The non-shooting probe is precise, bounded, reversible, and capable of rejecting both the barrier diagnosis and the intervention. It is highly attractive for an empirical partner, but scrutiny may find that the proposed gate is an ordinary implementation of established calibration automation rather than a meaningful strict opportunity."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":85,"causal_archetype_fit":87,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":52,"operational_specificity":93,"falsifiability_test_quality":91,"adopter_partner_path":92,"deployability_complexity":86,"authority_safety_reversibility":95,"strict_potential":73,"empirical_partner_potential":94,"scrutiny_priority":84,"biggest_visible_risk":"Manifest-driven packaging, validation, and workflow automation are known-looking post-production practices, so scrutiny may collapse the claim into routine pipeline tooling.","rationale":"The proposal addresses a frequent, costly handoff problem with unusually clear eligibility, unchanged acceptance standards, observable failure modes, and a safe shadow-mode study. A post-production partner can test 12 turnovers without vendor exposure or changes to production assets, making the decisive uncertainty inexpensive and falsifiable. Prior-art vulnerability is substantial, but the cross-vendor regeneration, specialist-scaling, and successive-cycle claims provide a sharper empirical target than a generic automation pitch."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_A","CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_C","CANDIDATE_B"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_A","portfolio_observation":"All four proposals are structurally credible and unusually testable, but each faces a recognizable-practice risk. A offers the best balance of consequential problem, causally essential reusable coordination, bounded authority, and a contrastive claim not reducible solely to software automation. D and C are stronger immediate partner experiments but more vulnerable to being ordinary pipeline and calibration engineering; B requires the most external coordination and has the weakest separation from existing intermediary services.","confidence":"HIGH"}