{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C020","selector_replication":2,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":88,"causal_archetype_fit":91,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":65,"operational_specificity":93,"falsifiability_test_quality":94,"adopter_partner_path":87,"deployability_complexity":70,"authority_safety_reversibility":91,"strict_potential":80,"empirical_partner_potential":91,"scrutiny_priority":88,"biggest_visible_risk":"The proposed compiler may prove to be privacy-intensive session replay plus structured intake, while the actual delay occurs downstream of successful reproduction.","rationale":"The recurring loss of situated interface context is credible and consequential, and the reusable selective compilation cycle is causally central rather than decorative. The 15-event matched, blinded reproduction probe is unusually bounded and decision-relevant, with strong consent, purge, rollback, and stop provisions. Scrutiny should focus on whether broad existing replay and reporting approaches absorb the contrastive claim and whether reproduction is truly rate-limiting."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":77,"causal_archetype_fit":90,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":58,"operational_specificity":92,"falsifiability_test_quality":91,"adopter_partner_path":85,"deployability_complexity":60,"authority_safety_reversibility":91,"strict_potential":68,"empirical_partner_potential":86,"scrutiny_priority":77,"biggest_visible_risk":"Formal token allocation may add queueing and strategic behavior to fluid collaboration without addressing the status, norms, or substantive conflicts that actually suppress participation.","rationale":"The bid-grant-release-reset mechanism fits the archetype tightly, and the counterbalanced sandbox test could decisively reveal whether cross-modal brokerage reduces collisions or merely relocates them. Safety and authority boundaries are strong. However, the problem may be situational, the integration burden spans several modalities, and the remaining contrast is vulnerable to looking like an expanded raised-hand queue or automated moderation."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":79,"causal_archetype_fit":88,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":47,"operational_specificity":94,"falsifiability_test_quality":90,"adopter_partner_path":88,"deployability_complexity":76,"authority_safety_reversibility":93,"strict_potential":60,"empirical_partner_potential":84,"scrutiny_priority":71,"biggest_visible_risk":"The foundry may amount to a well-governed combination of reusable prototyping infrastructure and Wizard-of-Oz research, leaving little meaningful contrastive claim.","rationale":"The setup burden and fidelity problem are credible, and the proposal supplies excellent behavioral contracts, operator limits, debriefing, reset rules, and a matched pilot. A research organization could resolve the operational uncertainty readily. Its lower scrutiny priority reflects limited consequence relative to the other problems and high text-visible prior-art vulnerability: most differentiators are governance and reuse around familiar prototype and simulation practices."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":92,"causal_archetype_fit":93,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":69,"operational_specificity":94,"falsifiability_test_quality":92,"adopter_partner_path":84,"deployability_complexity":62,"authority_safety_reversibility":95,"strict_potential":84,"empirical_partner_potential":89,"scrutiny_priority":90,"biggest_visible_risk":"Maintaining trustworthy, version-specific mappings across applications may require enough application-owner work and per-user exception repair to eliminate the claimed reusable leverage.","rationale":"Repeated translation of functional intent into already-supported settings is a consequential and sharply bounded barrier, and the compiler is essential to the proposed causal mechanism. Preview, confirmation, transactional rollback, explicit non-substitution for baseline accessibility, and the two-application sandbox make the first test safe and falsifiable. The chief scrutiny questions are whether existing preference mechanisms consume the contrast and whether mapping maintenance and subjective suitability prevent scalable turnover."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_A","CANDIDATE_B","CANDIDATE_C"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_D","portfolio_observation":"All four proposals specify unusually strong governance, regeneration, and falsification cycles. D and A pair consequential recurring barriers with bounded partner tests and the clearest residual claims; B remains empirically attractive but may formalize a secondary problem, while C is the most vulnerable to being absorbed by familiar practice.","confidence":"HIGH"}