{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C020","selector_replication":3,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":88,"causal_archetype_fit":92,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":71,"operational_specificity":95,"falsifiability_test_quality":96,"adopter_partner_path":88,"deployability_complexity":70,"authority_safety_reversibility":95,"strict_potential":86,"empirical_partner_potential":96,"scrutiny_priority":92,"biggest_visible_risk":"Capturing enough transient interface state for faithful reproduction may also capture sensitive content or produce a technically plausible replay that misrepresents the user's experience.","rationale":"The recurring loss of decisive context between users and product teams is credible and consequential, and the reusable, selective compile-release-purge cycle is causally central rather than decorative. The 15-event matched shadow study is unusually bounded, decision-relevant, and capable of falsifying both the problem and intervention. Existing structured reporting and session-replay practices make prior-art scrutiny important, but the user-invoked, previewable capsule and explicit regeneration cycle preserve a meaningful contrastive claim."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":76,"causal_archetype_fit":87,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":53,"operational_specificity":93,"falsifiability_test_quality":92,"adopter_partner_path":85,"deployability_complexity":73,"authority_safety_reversibility":94,"strict_potential":69,"empirical_partner_potential":90,"scrutiny_priority":79,"biggest_visible_risk":"The governed foundry may reduce to a well-run Wizard-of-Oz prototyping service, leaving little contrastive claim beyond standard research-operations discipline.","rationale":"The setup burden for testing adaptive behavior before backend construction is real, and the proposal tightly limits conclusions to experiential evidence. Its contracts, fidelity records, operator limits, reset cycle, and matched 12-session probe make it highly partner-testable. However, bespoke prototypes, reusable prototyping platforms, and controlled Wizard-of-Oz studies are visibly close rivals, so strict opportunity depends on demonstrating reusable leverage beyond familiar practice."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":65,"causal_archetype_fit":79,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":46,"operational_specificity":92,"falsifiability_test_quality":90,"adopter_partner_path":69,"deployability_complexity":51,"authority_safety_reversibility":93,"strict_potential":57,"empirical_partner_potential":78,"scrutiny_priority":66,"biggest_visible_risk":"Formal token allocation may add queueing and social friction to fluid collaboration, worsening the very bid-to-contribution delay it is intended to reduce.","rationale":"The proposal is carefully bounded and offers a strong counterbalanced sandbox test, but it is uncertain that floor-transition contention is the dominant cause of disrupted participation rather than power, norms, content accessibility, or limited time. Raised hands, token passing, moderation, and editing locks are close visible precedents, while cross-tool multimodal adapters substantially increase deployment burden. A partner could resolve the causal uncertainty, but the expected surviving strict claim is comparatively narrow."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":91,"causal_archetype_fit":93,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":67,"operational_specificity":96,"falsifiability_test_quality":96,"adopter_partner_path":86,"deployability_complexity":63,"authority_safety_reversibility":97,"strict_potential":85,"empirical_partner_potential":95,"scrutiny_priority":90,"biggest_visible_risk":"Application-specific contracts and mappings may drift so quickly that maintenance and exception work erase the claimed reusable reduction in translation effort.","rationale":"Repeated translation of functional preferences across applications is a consequential, recognizable burden, and the compiler is essential to the proposed causal pathway. User confirmation, transactional application, rollback, narrow reversible settings, and a matched sandbox comparison provide excellent safety and falsifiability. Its main vulnerabilities are close resemblance to preference synchronization and the operational dependency on willing application owners maintaining trustworthy mappings."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_A","CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_B","CANDIDATE_C"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_A","portfolio_observation":"A and D form the strongest scrutiny pair: both target consequential recurring translation burdens with bounded, reversible partner studies, while A has the clearer single-product adoption path and D has greater cross-application maintenance exposure. B is an attractive empirical-partner study but faces strong standard-practice resemblance. C is testable and safe, yet combines the weakest problem diagnosis with the heaviest integration burden relative to its likely benefit.","confidence":"MODERATE"}