{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C021","selector_replication":1,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":86,"causal_archetype_fit":88,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":74,"operational_specificity":92,"falsifiability_test_quality":94,"adopter_partner_path":91,"deployability_complexity":72,"authority_safety_reversibility":96,"strict_potential":80,"empirical_partner_potential":93,"scrutiny_priority":89,"biggest_visible_risk":"The supposed reusable translation bottleneck may actually consist mainly of theorem-specific mathematical invention, making the clinic an extra expert handoff rather than a reusable facilitator.","rationale":"The proposal addresses consequential coordination failures with a tightly bounded clinic, explicit eligibility boundaries, preserved proof authority, workload controls, and an unusually decision-relevant archived-case comparison. Its strongest lane is empirical partnership: a real project can determine whether interface work repeats and whether packets improve fidelity and total labor. It also retains a plausible contrast against glossaries, informal consultation, and added senior staffing."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":77,"causal_archetype_fit":96,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":40,"operational_specificity":96,"falsifiability_test_quality":92,"adopter_partner_path":78,"deployability_complexity":86,"authority_safety_reversibility":97,"strict_potential":72,"empirical_partner_potential":77,"scrutiny_priority":73,"biggest_visible_risk":"Reusing a Gröbner basis and certificate-producing normal-form computation for a fixed ideal looks very close to ordinary computational-algebra caching and automation, leaving little meaningful contrastive claim.","rationale":"This is exceptionally precise, bounded, auditable, and safe, with exact eligibility, independent certificate checking, immutable versions, and clear falsifiers. Deployment is comparatively straightforward. Its scrutiny value is reduced because the intervention's central mechanism is highly standard-looking, the problem is narrow, and the fixed-context repetition needed to justify a governed lane may be uncommon."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":83,"causal_archetype_fit":94,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":58,"operational_specificity":95,"falsifiability_test_quality":94,"adopter_partner_path":84,"deployability_complexity":75,"authority_safety_reversibility":98,"strict_potential":82,"empirical_partner_potential":86,"scrutiny_priority":84,"biggest_visible_risk":"Existing equivalence-based theorem-transfer and tactic mechanisms may subsume the gateway, while generated statements and proof terms could be less maintainable than manual counterparts.","rationale":"The gateway has a clean transformation target, a causally essential reusable equivalence bundle, kernel-enforced correctness, explicit basis safeguards, strict admission rules, and a strong archived-pair test that measures repair and maintenance rather than throughput alone. It offers both strict and partner potential, although representation transport is a familiar-looking formalization pattern and API drift or opaque outputs could erase the advantage."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":88,"causal_archetype_fit":92,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":47,"operational_specificity":94,"falsifiability_test_quality":93,"adopter_partner_path":85,"deployability_complexity":70,"authority_safety_reversibility":95,"strict_potential":73,"empirical_partner_potential":86,"scrutiny_priority":78,"biggest_visible_risk":"Faithful predicate encoding may remain the dominant case-specific work, while canonical enumeration scales poorly and resembles established bounded counterexample-search practice.","rationale":"Avoiding proof effort on finitely refutable conjectures is important, and the proposal sharply limits epistemic claims, independently validates witnesses, and offers a strong archival test with known witnesses and ineligible cases. A partner could decisively measure encoding burden and missed-witness risk. However, reusable graph enumeration and bounded falsification are standard-looking, scalability is intrinsically constrained, and no-witness dossiers may still create behavioral overconfidence."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_A","CANDIDATE_C","CANDIDATE_D","CANDIDATE_B"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_A","portfolio_observation":"A offers the strongest empirical-partner opportunity and the most resilient prospective contrast, while C is the strongest technically bounded strict candidate. B and D are highly testable and safe but appear more vulnerable to being absorbed by familiar automation, caching, or bounded-search practice; D ranks above B because its consequential decision problem and partner-resolvable uncertainties are broader.","confidence":"MODERATE"}