{"schema_version":1,"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp07_retrospective_selector60_20260803","cell_code":"E7C022","selector_replication":1,"assessments":[{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_A","problem_reality_importance":86,"causal_archetype_fit":93,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":67,"operational_specificity":94,"falsifiability_test_quality":95,"adopter_partner_path":89,"deployability_complexity":76,"authority_safety_reversibility":94,"strict_potential":86,"empirical_partner_potential":92,"scrutiny_priority":85,"biggest_visible_risk":"The acoustic cell may prove to be a technically elaborate variant of established sonication or microfluidic dispersion, with apparent improvement caused by particle retention, heating, or ordinary flow effects.","rationale":"The preparation problem is consequential and directly measurable, and the reusable acoustic facilitator is causally central rather than decorative. Split-aliquot untreated, sham-cell, and current-protocol controls, whole-distribution characterization, mass balance, regeneration checks, and explicit halt rules create an unusually decision-relevant test. The main weaknesses are device integration, contamination and fouling burdens, and vulnerability of the narrow contrastive claim to known-looking acoustic dispersion practice."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_B","problem_reality_importance":88,"causal_archetype_fit":87,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":61,"operational_specificity":95,"falsifiability_test_quality":94,"adopter_partner_path":93,"deployability_complexity":92,"authority_safety_reversibility":96,"strict_potential":82,"empirical_partner_potential":89,"scrutiny_priority":81,"biggest_visible_risk":"The proposal may reduce to standard design-rule checking, recipe-library reuse, proximity-correction software, or workflow automation rather than preserving a distinctive reusable-facilitator claim.","rationale":"This is a credible specialist-queue problem with a highly deployable shadow-mode probe, objective eligibility rules, independent recipe release, witness coupons, and straightforward rollback. The proposed calibration-change test could resolve its central reuse and regeneration claim with a facility partner. Its scrutiny value is limited chiefly by strong prior-art vulnerability and the possibility that syntax conversion, standardization, or hidden per-design engineering explains nearly all benefit."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_C","problem_reality_importance":84,"causal_archetype_fit":97,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":71,"operational_specificity":92,"falsifiability_test_quality":95,"adopter_partner_path":86,"deployability_complexity":70,"authority_safety_reversibility":93,"strict_potential":89,"empirical_partner_potential":94,"scrutiny_priority":88,"biggest_visible_risk":"The patterned surface may foul, shed material, retain products, or require restoration or replacement proportional to output, defeating the claimed regenerable catalytic pathway.","rationale":"This proposal has the strongest archetype fit: an immobilized interface explicitly provides an alternative nucleation pathway, releases product, and must demonstrate turnover after restoration. The inert-cartridge and batch controls, complete output characterization, downstream-growth acceptance, and cycle-level ready-state assays can decisively distinguish interfacial catalysis from mixing, flow, contamination, or consumable seeding. Fabricating and validating the cartridge is nontrivial, but a bounded laboratory partner can resolve the decisive uncertainty safely and directly."},{"blind_id":"CANDIDATE_D","problem_reality_importance":87,"causal_archetype_fit":77,"distinctiveness_prior_art_resilience":58,"operational_specificity":93,"falsifiability_test_quality":90,"adopter_partner_path":91,"deployability_complexity":87,"authority_safety_reversibility":95,"strict_potential":71,"empirical_partner_potential":85,"scrutiny_priority":74,"biggest_visible_risk":"The standing service may be ordinary coordination and standardization whose labor still scales with every case, making regeneration language metaphorical and the catalyst archetype causally nonessential.","rationale":"Cross-facility translation, custody, and evidence reconstruction are plausible operational burdens, and the proposal supplies unusually careful governance, exception routing, workload caps, independent acceptance, appeals, and rollback. A six-case pilot could expose false qualification, hidden labor, gatekeeping, and downstream queue shifting. However, its core intervention closely resembles established-looking brokerage and qualification services, and the same gains may arise from a checklist, shared template, or added coordinator without a distinctive regenerable-facilitator mechanism."}],"rank_order":["CANDIDATE_C","CANDIDATE_A","CANDIDATE_B","CANDIDATE_D"],"top_choice":"CANDIDATE_C","portfolio_observation":"All four proposals are unusually bounded and testable, so the main separation is archetype necessity and resilience of the contrastive claim. The two physical-interface proposals offer the clearest facilitator-on/off causal tests; the informational compiler is easier to deploy but more exposed to standard automation rivals, while the handoff service has strong partner feasibility but the weakest non-metaphorical archetype dependence.","confidence":"HIGH"}